[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Presentations, (Deep dead drifts)
- Subject: Presentations, (Deep dead drifts)
- Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:37:28 -0500
Walter & Group...
This morning, Rick Whorwood and I had a long
conversation about methods of achieving good presentations with deep running
dead drifts in a river (or salty channel) with multiple current
tongues.
Rick and Marty Tannahil had had dialogue and
messages between them on this subject.
Hopefully some of you Spey folks can come up with
some good suggestions.
Let's start with Rick's questions, then go to
Marty's. I've outlined their specific questions
in bold red
italics. :-
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Gordy
Great having a chat with you this morning, all the best in
the new year !!
I guess my point in our conversation this morning was what
methods do other anglers use to present a fly in a swing situation when wanting
get deep. Getting to the bottom is simple enough it's doing it with a clean
scope, letting the fly to swim thru the water in a perfect presentation.
The line that I mentioned (and
also Marty mentioned) was a compact head, made by Airflo. By shorting the
standard Airflo Skagit line from 40 to 30+ and being a floating section, would
this not cause more drag on the surface tension, in essence causing it to change
the swing of the fly ?
The extra compressed
grain wt. in the compact line would certainly help turn over the longer
tip, but would it hamper the swing ?
Rick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Rick...
Theoretically, the greater diameter of that
line tip would offer greater resistance to the current. Whether this would
be offset by the increased density sufficiently, I don't
know.
All other things being equal, the design and
length of your leader will have a strong effect. Also, the size, tie
(bulky or sparse) and weight of your fly as well as its design (tube fly,
standard tie, etc.)
Lots to consider, here.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This from Marty Tannahil :-
Hi Gordy:
I hope you’ve had an enjoyable Christmas and best wishes for a
healthy
new year.
I know Rick has introduced the subject with you
in a recent email and
in my discussions with him he thought it might
be informative to
consult you and the group on the matter.
So
here is the scenario: Lets call the problem getting down and
presenting the fly.
This past fall, I fished with a 2-hander (Skagit
style) using custom
tips measuring 12’. The tips are constructed of
various lengths of
floating line and T-10 totaling 12’. I was
initially using an Airflo
NW 8/9 Skagit line, which has a length of
32’. Using this line,
casting becomes work when you get beyond 15’ of
T-10. It really
becomes a chore when I moved up to T-14. Recently, I
switched to the
Airflo Compact Skagit lines (540-570 grains).
This line can easily cast 20’of T-14
which is usually enough to get down in most
situations
but
will the fly be presented appropriately?
The interaction between
the river currents, flow rate and depth
are some of the variables that
I struggled with in my attempt to work
on the problem. I wanted an
outfit that was manageable from a casting
perspective and would get
down to the fish with a presentation that
was predictable. I am now
looking at using sinking heads or a
combination of intermediate line
with sink
tips.
I’m wondering what others would
have to say on the matter.
Marty