[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • FW: Re: STOP?



    Paul & Jeff....

    Could we not look at it as an action in which the caster ROTATES THE BUTT SECTION OF THE ROD TO A STOP ?

    I think both of you are correct.

                                                                                         Gordy




     


    From: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Reply-To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: "Jeff Wagner" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    CC: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re: STOP?
    Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:26:27 -0000
    Hi Jeff,
    Sure I stop the rod, but by the time I've stopped the energy
    has been transferred. Dunno which video you're looking at but the
    most recent is http://www.sexyloops.com/movies/shufflecast/shuffle.mpg
    Interesting contrast to http://www.sexyloops.com/movies/distancecast/distancecast2.mpg

    "The problem with your description is that is
    >not always true. In a very short cast the angle could be a 90."
    In which case it's not a stopless cast.

    I'm not arguing that a crisp stop isn't a good thing; I think it often is but
    not because of "efficient energy transfer", but rather because the crisp
    stop is preceded by sharp butt rotation and that's the key. The stop is
    a stop, for many years I fell into the trap of mixing butt stop with butt rotation.
    I think that's what you are doing now.

    Cheers,
    Paul

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:55 AM
    Subject: Re: STOP?


    >Paul,
    >
    >I think we are on the same track no matter how much of what I say
    >you agree,
    >because about half of what you are saying doesnt make any sense to
    >me.
    >
    >Power application is just that, the application of power. Energy
    >transfer is
    >just that the transfer of energy. I can hold a rod in mind hand
    >that is loaded
    >full of energy because I applied a force to the rod to make it move
    >and then
    >applied a force (energy) to make it stop. It is at this point where
    >the rod
    >butt has stopped that the rod tip can unflex and the energy can
    >transfer into
    >the rod. The application part has stopped (in a physical sense of
    >me applying
    >force tot he rod) and now the energy stored in the bent rod is being
    >release..
    >
    >The way I see it in my minds eye the angle is acute with the butt of
    >the rod
    >and the fly line. The tip of the rod could be pointed forward, the
    >butt toward
    >the caster and the fly line would be attached to the tip and
    >pointing in the
    >same direction as the butt toward the caster. In this description
    >Yes the more
    >straight the rod becomes the more energy has been transfered. I
    >agree with
    >that. I said that in several previous e-mails by stating that as
    >the rod
    >unflexes the energy is released. The problem with your description
    >is that is
    >not always true. In a very short cast the angle could be a 90.
    >
    >Of course rod rotation and rod unbending give more energy and speed
    >to the cast,
    >that is not debatable. An angular rotation at any velocity is a
    >continuous
    >acceleration which gives a great load to the rod but also increases
    >line speed
    >dircetly.
    >
    >Of the video of you distace casting that I have seen on the website
    >and last
    >year at the conclave. I thought I saw a stop. It may not be the
    >classic stop
    >that youa re thinking of but there is definitley a quick
    >deceleration.
    >
    >--
    >Jeff Wagner
    >
    >Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly Fishers
    >Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >Redington Pro Staff
    >970-481-5887
    >jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >www.dhflyfishing.com
    >
    >
    >
    >--
    >Jeff Wagner
    >
    >Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly Fishers
    >Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >Redington Pro Staff
    >970-481-5887
    >jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >www.dhflyfishing.com
    >
    >
    >Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >
    >>Hi Jeff,
    >>I disagree with about half of what you've written below.
    >>Power application is the transfer of energy from hand to
    >>rod butt.
    >>
    >>The only thing I can add to anything I've written earlier is this:
    >>
    >>As the angle the butt makes to the line becomes acute,
    >>ie approaches zero, the load on the tip diminishes,
    >>the rod straightens and transfers energy to the line.
    >>
    >>I believe this results in a higher tip speed and not lower
    >>since tip speed has now become a combination of
    >>rod rotation and rod unbending and not rod unbending alone.
    >>
    >>For what it's worth I use a stopless cast for distance.for
    >>seven weights and below. I don't have the strength to
    >>do it with heavier lines.
    >>
    >>Cheers,
    >>Paul
    >>
    >>
    >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:47 PM
    >>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>
    >>
    >>>I think we are saying the exact same thing. Power application is
    >>>energy
    >>>transfer. If the power application is over a longer period of
    >>>time then it is
    >>>a longer energy dissipation. Power application and energy go hand
    >>>in hand. The pooint of a power application is to transfer energy
    >>>from our body to the
    >>>rod and to the fly line. If we are talking specifically about rod
    >>>unload the
    >>>energy is being transfered to the fly line from the rod. If we
    >>>are talking
    >>>about a classic power application meaning the speed up to a stop
    >>>we are
    >>>applying energy. But in a lazy stop the dissipation is occuring
    >>>over a longer
    >>>period of time. To this I mean that there is only so much energy
    >>>that will be
    >>>transfered to the fly line as the rod unflexes. If this happens
    >>>quick a great
    >>>deal of energy will be transfered to the line in an effective
    >>>instant when the
    >>>line is begining to move beyond the rod. If I were to exagerate
    >>>this movement
    >>>by decelerating slowly the fly line could continue to move forward
    >>>while I move
    >>>the rod down or to the side slightly, with a short cast the line
    >>>could
    >>>completely unroll before I have stopped the rod fully. If the
    >>>line unrolls
    >>>fully and then I fully stop by a continual deceleration no
    >>>effective energy
    >>>would be transfered. In which my timing sucks. If I would have
    >>>stopped the
    >>>rod more abruptly then the energy would have been used more
    >>>effectively.
    >>>
    >>>I am not sure how you can say power application is the problem.
    >>>In the classic
    >>>sense of the word the power application is getting the rod to
    >>>bend. If we are
    >>>taling about a deceleration (lazy stop) then the power application
    >>>is already
    >>>over. However, since power application is such a broad term it
    >>>could be used
    >>>to describe the power applied to create the stop. As could
    >>>energy, we could
    >>>say energy has to be applied to the rod to make it stop.
    >>>
    >>>I am not sure where we are going with this?
    >>>
    >>>--
    >>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>
    >>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly Fishers
    >>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>970-481-5887
    >>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>
    >>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>I disagree that the "problem" with a lazy stop is energy
    >>>>transfer.
    >>>>It may be power application, it may be tip path, but it is not
    >>>>energy transfer.
    >>>>
    >>>>"A very rapid
    >>>>>deceleration more effectively transfers the energy into the fly
    >>>>>line, because
    >>>>>it is a over a short period of time."
    >>>>
    >>>>The transfer of energy is not time dependent.
    >>>>
    >>>>Cheers,
    >>>>Paul
    >>>>
    >>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:44 PM
    >>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>>Paul,
    >>>>>
    >>>>>The enregy that is transfered anytime very rarely stays in one
    >>>>>from. While a
    >>>>>great deal of energy would be a movement a kinetic energy as
    >>>>>most know it. It
    >>>>>will still produce some heat and some sound (possibly) although
    >>>>>they may be
    >>>>>very minimal the transfer is not 100% motion. Friction between
    >>>>>the fibers,
    >>>>>much like friction between uscle fibers, will create some heat.
    >>>>>You asked what
    >>>>>type of energy I guess I misread the problem.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>What I was trying to convey is that wether a very long
    >>>>>deceleration or a very
    >>>>>short deceleration (stop as we think of it), energy is still
    >>>>>transfered from
    >>>>>the flexed rod to the fly line as the rod unflexes propelling
    >>>>>the line forward.
    >>>>>The difference between these decelerations is how much of the
    >>>>>energy would be
    >>>>>usable to efficiently propelling the fly line forward. A very
    >>>>>rapid
    >>>>>deceleration more effectively transfers the energy into the fly
    >>>>>line, because
    >>>>>it is a over a short period of time. This concept is similar to
    >>>>>the timig of
    >>>>>the release of the haul. I will not describe as I think we could
    >>>>>get off on
    >>>>>another tangent as that is another greatly debated topic. But
    >>>>>it is more
    >>>>>effective releasing at one time during the stroke. The same
    >>>>>could be said for
    >>>>>the stop and the transfer of energy from the rod to the fly
    >>>>>line. A slow
    >>>>>deceleration releases the energy over a longer period of time
    >>>>>with less energy
    >>>>>being trasnfered at any one instant, thus transfering less
    >>>>>energy into the fly
    >>>>>line at any one instance.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>--
    >>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>"The energy would be in the form of heat, movemenet, sound
    >>>>>>(very
    >>>>>>>little)."
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Are you saying the rod gets hotter with a lazy stop?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Movement I can understand, the energy is dissipated from rod to
    >>>>>>line
    >>>>>>or better stated, transferred.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>That's how I understand it anyway.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:48 AM
    >>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Paul,
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Eergy dissipated on a lazy stop is simply dissipated over a
    >>>>>>>longer period of
    >>>>>>>time and less of the energy would be transfered and used in
    >>>>>>>prepolling the
    >>>>>>>line. The energy would be in the form of heat, movemenet,
    >>>>>>>sound (very little).
    >>>>>>>But to me its not what it is transferred as but when, it is
    >>>>>>>the timing. If I
    >>>>>>>cast 40 feet of line and make two consecutive casts 1 with a
    >>>>>>>solid stop and the
    >>>>>>>other with a longer stop a wider loop would form and less line
    >>>>>>>speed would be
    >>>>>>>achieved. I think this can be shown definitely through
    >>>>>>>casting, but also
    >>>>>>>through the casting analyzer which measures those variables.
    >>>>>>>Of course it is
    >>>>>>>possible to cast 40 feet with with no actual stop and a very
    >>>>>>>long decelerationa
    >>>>>>>dn get good results because it is very easy to achieve that
    >>>>>>>much power on such a
    >>>>>>>short line, but that is not the point of the exercise.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>On your second poit that a decleration occurs before a stop.
    >>>>>>>Of course that is
    >>>>>>>true. I dont think that is a revelation! You have to
    >>>>>>>decelerate to stop. A
    >>>>>>>car doesnt just cese to move some energy must be put into
    >>>>>>>making it slow down
    >>>>>>>to a stop. The same is true of the casting arm and fly rod.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>When I mentioned maximum tip velocity below it was a maximum
    >>>>>>>tip velocity before
    >>>>>>>any sort of deceleration had occured to make the rod unflex.
    >>>>>>>Which has to
    >>>>>>>happen. There is no cast where a cast is made with no help
    >>>>>>>from the fly rod by
    >>>>>>>going from a flexed state to an unflexed state. The
    >>>>>>>deceleration may be very
    >>>>>>>slow and add very little but it still happens.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>In the swoop it may all be one fluid motion and it may not
    >>>>>>>have a solid stop. But, in order for a RSP to occur a
    >>>>>>>deceleration of the hand must occur which
    >>>>>>>allows the rod tip a nd fly line to begint overcome the lower
    >>>>>>>section of the
    >>>>>>>rod and the hand. The hand may not be stopped, or the butt
    >>>>>>>for that matter,
    >>>>>>>but a deceleration has occured.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>When you say butt, do you mean the very bottom of the rod
    >>>>>>>below the hand. I
    >>>>>>>know this sounds stupid. But if that is the case then I would
    >>>>>>>say that the
    >>>>>>>stop is almost imperceptable and we are seeing a follow
    >>>>>>>through. Similar to a
    >>>>>>>motion in a drift. I think this happens almost every great
    >>>>>>>casters cast. However, a massive deceleration has occured to
    >>>>>>>allow the ro to get to RSP then
    >>>>>>>a follow through.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>There are a couple of things I don't agree with below:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>" quicker
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration means a greater amount of energy would be
    >>>>>>>>>transferred more quickly
    >>>>>>>>>into the flyline and less of it would be dissipated after
    >>>>>>>>>its effectiveness in
    >>>>>>>>>the cast."
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>How do you see energy being dissipated on a "lazy stop"? And
    >>>>>>>>in what form?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>"But the
    >>>>>>>>>stop IS the point of energy transfer from rod to line and
    >>>>>>>>>does impart more
    >>>>>>>>>energy into the cast than would be lost from counterflex or
    >>>>>>>>>other ineffective
    >>>>>>>>>motions associated with the stop when done properly.
    >>>>>>>>"
    >>>>>>>>When the rod is unbending it is transferring energy from rod
    >>>>>>>>to line, this begins
    >>>>>>>>when the rod butt is being decelerated/angle of line to rod
    >>>>>>>>becomes acute.
    >>>>>>>>This *always* occurs prior to butt stop.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>"The deceleration would be after a
    >>>>>>>>>maximum tip velocity and the inability of the caster to
    >>>>>>>>>maintain an
    >>>>>>>>>acceleration, an action caused by the caster intentionally
    >>>>>>>>>slowing the rod
    >>>>>>>>>(stopping) or unintentionally from running out of arm"
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>Maximum tip velocity occurs at Rod Straight Position which
    >>>>>>>>normally
    >>>>>>>>occurs after the stop, but in some cases can occur during the
    >>>>>>>>stroke
    >>>>>>>>(making the stop a non-essential)..
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>The swoop stroke I am thinking of, pulls down with no butt
    >>>>>>>>rotation,
    >>>>>>>>rotates the butt around a fixed point and then drives upward,
    >>>>>>>>pointing the rod in the direction of the cast.
    >>>>>>>>It's all one fluid motion. RSP occurs before butt stop.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>I know the recognised theory, Jeff, but I don't think it's
    >>>>>>>>complete.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 4:49 AM
    >>>>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Paul,
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>A minor point. You can have a stopless cast. But every
    >>>>>>>>>cast has a
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration. even if that deceleration is over a long
    >>>>>>>>>period of time or large
    >>>>>>>>>distance.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>IF I understand your description properly there is still a
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration in the
    >>>>>>>>>rod at the end of the stroke or in this case when 170
    >>>>>>>>>degrees is attained. Any
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration from a maximum tip velocity will cause the tip
    >>>>>>>>>to straighten. And
    >>>>>>>>>consequently energy to transfer from the rod to the fly
    >>>>>>>>>line. Since it is the
    >>>>>>>>>tip that is unbending and has the motion most of the energy
    >>>>>>>>>would be expelled
    >>>>>>>>>through the tip. The amount of energy that would go into
    >>>>>>>>>the cast would depend
    >>>>>>>>>on several variables including the time of the deceleration,
    >>>>>>>>>a quicker
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration means a greater amount of energy would be
    >>>>>>>>>transfered more quickly
    >>>>>>>>>into the flyline and less of it would be dissipated after
    >>>>>>>>>its effectiveness in
    >>>>>>>>>the cast. Timing!
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>If your debate is when is the rod straightening it is
    >>>>>>>>>during/after a
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration, not necessarily a stop. The deceleration
    >>>>>>>>>would be after a
    >>>>>>>>>maximum tip velocity and the inability of the caster to
    >>>>>>>>>maintain an
    >>>>>>>>>acceleration, an action caused by the caster intentionally
    >>>>>>>>>slowing the rod
    >>>>>>>>>(stopping) or unintentionally from running out of arm. Both
    >>>>>>>>>have a
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration. I would call attention to Steve Rajeff and
    >>>>>>>>>other tournament
    >>>>>>>>>style casters where the the stop is the defining mark
    >>>>>>>>>between a good caster and
    >>>>>>>>>great caster. Again, timing of the release would have
    >>>>>>>>>something to do with this
    >>>>>>>>>but also energy transfer. A longer stop has more time to
    >>>>>>>>>transfer energy and
    >>>>>>>>>losing its effective timing.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>If you are contending that the majority of the energy has
    >>>>>>>>>been transfered before
    >>>>>>>>>the stop. I would say that definitely some of the energy
    >>>>>>>>>has been imparted to
    >>>>>>>>>the rod as the line is pulled through the air, if this were
    >>>>>>>>>not the case the
    >>>>>>>>>line would not be moving. Once the line is in motion it
    >>>>>>>>>will continue at the
    >>>>>>>>>speed of the tip, decreasing after energy is no longer being
    >>>>>>>>>imparted to the
    >>>>>>>>>line in which case it is effected by gravity, air
    >>>>>>>>>resistance, etc. But the
    >>>>>>>>>stop IS the point of energy transfer from rod to line and
    >>>>>>>>>does impart more
    >>>>>>>>>energy into the cast than would be lost from counterflex or
    >>>>>>>>>other ineffective
    >>>>>>>>>motions associated with the stop when done properly.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>As for the swoop. I dont doubt that it can be a very
    >>>>>>>>>effective technique. However, that doesnt mean anything
    >>>>>>>>>about the rod not stopping or decelerating. If we are using
    >>>>>>>>>the same term for swoop, meaning a dipped down path to the
    >>>>>>>>>hand
    >>>>>>>>>in the middle of the stroke to ensure a straight path to the
    >>>>>>>>>tip of the rod. A
    >>>>>>>>>maximum deceleration would occur at the end of the stroke
    >>>>>>>>>and energy transfered
    >>>>>>>>>to the fly line. I dont think that this is the most
    >>>>>>>>>effective technique as it
    >>>>>>>>>means less bend in the rod is happening than for a caster
    >>>>>>>>>that is moving the
    >>>>>>>>>hand in a arcing motion or even a straight line (if both
    >>>>>>>>>casters are using the
    >>>>>>>>>same rod and similar stroke length). But, if it works for
    >>>>>>>>>the guy who cares.
    >>>>>>>>>As I said in an earlier e-mail style is very individual and
    >>>>>>>>>there is more than
    >>>>>>>>>one to get the job done. I have been told recently that my
    >>>>>>>>>style is not
    >>>>>>>>>appropriate either but I get decent results. Just not in
    >>>>>>>>>pesky comps!!
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>I think I understand your discussion. The way I would break
    >>>>>>>>>it down would be in
    >>>>>>>>>two parts. The old lever and spring concept (lever and
    >>>>>>>>>flexiable lever).
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>1. Lever (non-flexiable as an example) energy is imparted
    >>>>>>>>>directly to the line
    >>>>>>>>>as the line is pulled through the air. The line will
    >>>>>>>>>continue regarless of
    >>>>>>>>>stop. The line will keep moving only slowing as the line is
    >>>>>>>>>acted on by air
    >>>>>>>>>resistance, friction, etc. This could happen regarless of
    >>>>>>>>>the means of the
    >>>>>>>>>line being pulled, this is true since a flexed rod as it
    >>>>>>>>>moves through the air
    >>>>>>>>>is being flexed and is for this purpose not moving. The
    >>>>>>>>>same could be true for
    >>>>>>>>>a broomstick or even hand casting.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>2. Spring. The point where the flexiable lever, the rod,
    >>>>>>>>>is unflexing and
    >>>>>>>>>transfering the energy to fly line, propelling it forward.
    >>>>>>>>>The rod must flex
    >>>>>>>>>and unflex to do this. I think this can be shown to be very
    >>>>>>>>>effective by
    >>>>>>>>>having a flexed lever and unflexable lever cast next to each
    >>>>>>>>>other. The
    >>>>>>>>>efficiency of the flexiable lever imparting energy to the
    >>>>>>>>>fly line depends on
    >>>>>>>>>many factors is effecient enough to have a net increase in
    >>>>>>>>>energy.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Let me know if I am missing your point.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>>>my thoughts on this is that in a 170 degree "stopless" arc
    >>>>>>>>>>the rod will
    >>>>>>>>>>straighten as theangle between the flyline and the rod butt
    >>>>>>>>>>becomes acute.
    >>>>>>>>>>The loop is still top pointed so I assume this to be true.
    >>>>>>>>>>The energy
    >>>>>>>>>>stored in the bend rod has to go somewhere, either through
    >>>>>>>>>>the tip
    >>>>>>>>>>or through the butt. If you're rotating the rod through 170
    >>>>>>>>>>while it's
    >>>>>>>>>>unbending the energy is going to go through the tip without
    >>>>>>>>>>the need
    >>>>>>>>>>for an abrupt stop. At least this is what I *think* is
    >>>>>>>>>>happening.
    >>>>>>>>>>What we really need is a high speed camera. I hope to have
    >>>>>>>>>>access to one
    >>>>>>>>>>before I leave NZ.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>Incidentally I know of a Spanish distance caster who uses
    >>>>>>>>>>the swoop to
    >>>>>>>>>>cast into the mid 120s.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>Jeff....
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>You bring up some interesting points.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>I'll pass this on to the Group with the suggestion that it
    >>>>>>>>>>>may help to print this out and study it at leisure. There
    >>>>>>>>>>>is a lot of thought going into this message.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>Gordy
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>>>>>>>>> From: Jeff Wagner <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>> To: Gordon Hill <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:49:34 -0700
    >>>>>>>>>>> Gordy,
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> This thread is very interesting. Hope you dont mind if I
    >>>>>>>>>>>put in a word.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Paul on a a few issues and you on others.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> When casting, any speed that is directly applied to the
    >>>>>>>>>>>rod is also applied to
    >>>>>>>>>>> the fly line. In which case the line will continue
    >>>>>>>>>>>forward whether the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>> stops or slows or just gets out of the way. We can see
    >>>>>>>>>>>this when we do a
    >>>>>>>>>>> thrust cast as paul notes. However is this the most
    >>>>>>>>>>>efficient cast? I will
    >>>>>>>>>>> suggest no, and state that it is possible to perform
    >>>>>>>>>>>this cast with an
    >>>>>>>>>>> unflexible lever by simply slinging the line. Any more
    >>>>>>>>>>>distance is achieved by
    >>>>>>>>>>> the energy imparted to the fly line by the flexing
    >>>>>>>>>>>(unflexing) of a fly rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> However, energy from the cast by a fly rod is imparted
    >>>>>>>>>>>at some point in the
    >>>>>>>>>>> cast. Where? It can only be during a deceleration after
    >>>>>>>>>>>a maximum velocity is
    >>>>>>>>>>> achieved. In other words for the distance caster after
    >>>>>>>>>>>the loading move the
    >>>>>>>>>>> speed up and the wrist flip we achieve maximum velocity.
    >>>>>>>>>>>At this point we
    >>>>>>>>>>> could maintain this velocity however we usually run out
    >>>>>>>>>>>of arm. In which case
    >>>>>>>>>>> we decelerate and the rod unflexs and imparts energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>into the fly line. Again
    >>>>>>>>>>> evidence for this can be seen in casting a unflexible
    >>>>>>>>>>>lever versus casting a
    >>>>>>>>>>> fly rod. We cast farther with a fly rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> The rate of deceleration I think is the key. As can be
    >>>>>>>>>>>seen in Bruce's fly
    >>>>>>>>>>> casting analyzer. The faster the deceleration the more
    >>>>>>>>>>>quickly the energy is
    >>>>>>>>>>> transfered to the rod and the more efficient the energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>transfer is as the
    >>>>>>>>>>> energy is not wasted over a long period of time. This
    >>>>>>>>>>>quick deceleration is
    >>>>>>>>>>> the difference between great casters like Rajeff and a
    >>>>>>>>>>>beginner cast.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> As you and Jeff noted it is possible to make to abrupt
    >>>>>>>>>>>of a stop without taking
    >>>>>>>>>>> proper measures and shock the rod. However if you watch
    >>>>>>>>>>>Rajeff and others like
    >>>>>>>>>>> him they do take measures after a VERY abrupt stop often
    >>>>>>>>>>>tilting the tip of the
    >>>>>>>>>>> rod down and lifting the butt of the rod up (usually
    >>>>>>>>>>>with very stiff rods that
    >>>>>>>>>>> rebound very quickly) to move the tip of the rod out of
    >>>>>>>>>>>the way of the oncoming
    >>>>>>>>>>> fly line. An action needed because of the abrupt stop
    >>>>>>>>>>>teamed with a very narrow
    >>>>>>>>>>> casting arc.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> I have attemped to demonstrate this when casting. I will
    >>>>>>>>>>>first carry a good
    >>>>>>>>>>> amount of line and on the final forward stroke continue
    >>>>>>>>>>>forward and lay the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>> down without really stopping the rod, simply continuing
    >>>>>>>>>>>the motion only changing
    >>>>>>>>>>> direction toward the ground with the rod while the fly
    >>>>>>>>>>>line continues to unroll.
    >>>>>>>>>>> Second, I cast normal and stop the rod abruptly causing
    >>>>>>>>>>>counterflex in the rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>> The normal casts with a stop and subsuquently a
    >>>>>>>>>>>counterflex always go farther. The cast which has no
    >>>>>>>>>>>defined stop as in a thrust cast still has a deceleration
    >>>>>>>>>>> and energy transfered to the fly line this is
    >>>>>>>>>>>unavoidable as the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>> straightens. However, a very long deceleration or lack
    >>>>>>>>>>>of a stop as we are
    >>>>>>>>>>> calling it here would transfer less energy.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> i would also note that at the veolcity reached by many
    >>>>>>>>>>>great distance casters it
    >>>>>>>>>>> may be very difficult to bring the rod to a full
    >>>>>>>>>>>instantaneous stop. Instead
    >>>>>>>>>>> the rod would continue forward and actually soften the
    >>>>>>>>>>>stop slightly.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Still a defined quick deceleration of the rod after
    >>>>>>>>>>>maximum velocity of the tip
    >>>>>>>>>>> will offer the best transfer of energy, the best case
    >>>>>>>>>>>scenario for distance
    >>>>>>>>>>> casting.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> --
    >>>>>>>>>>> Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of
    >>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>>> Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>> Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>> Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>>> 970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>>> jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>>> www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Gordon Hill <hillshead@xxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> > Paul... We are getting a little complicated for many
    >>>>>>>>>>>in our
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Group, here. My brief comments in your text in BOLD
    >>>>>>>>>>>CAPS. > >Gordy
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >-------------------------
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> > From: /"Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Reply-To: /"Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/
    >>>>>>>>>>> >To: /"Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>/
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Subject: /Re: Actual demo of ESSENTIALS/
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Date: /Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:32:15 -0000/
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Hi Gordy,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >The reason I'd like to see casting arc included in (3)
    >>>>>>>>>>>is because it >deals with progressive
    >>>>>>>>>>> >rod bending and is quite specific. It's possible to
    >>>>>>>>>>>make a long cast >a short stroke length,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >underhand casting styles for example. Bruce Richards
    >>>>>>>>>>>reckons drag
    >>>>>>>>>>> >[translational rod movement
    >>>>>>>>>>> >pre-butt rotation] removes slack, Bill Gammel thinks it
    >>>>>>>>>>>removes sag, >I think it adds Kinetic
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Energy. It probably does all three. But I don't think
    >>>>>>>>>>>increasing
    >>>>>>>>>>> >stroke length is an essential
    >>>>>>>>>>> >whereas widening the casting arc most certainly is. I
    >>>>>>>>>>>AGREE THAT,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >\"STROKE LENGTH\" DOESN'T COVER IT ALL. AS I LOOK AT IT
    >>>>>>>>>>>, TIP
    >>>>>>>>>>>TRAVEL IS >MOST IMPORTANT......A COMBINATION OF STROKE
    >>>>>>>>>>>LENGTH, ROD (CASTING) ARC, >AND ANY OTHER TRANSLATIONAL
    >>>>>>>>>>>MOVEMENTS IN THE DIRECTION OF THE CAST. (WE >MUST REMEMBER
    >>>>>>>>>>>THAT BACK WHEN THESE WERE WRITTEN, MANY WERE USING THE
    >>>>>>>>>>> >TERM, \"STROKE LENGTH\" TO MEAN WHAT
    >>>>>>>>>>>WE >NOW CALL, \"TIP TRAVEL\".) PRE-BUTT ROTATION,
    >>>>>>>>>>>\"PULL\", \"DRAG\" OR >ANY TRANSLATIONAL MOTION IN THE
    >>>>>>>>>>>DIRECTION OF THE CAST PROBABLY
    >>>>>>>>>>> >_DOES_ REMOVE SLACK AND SAG AND ADDS KINETIC
    >>>>>>>>>>>ENERGY.......ALL
    >>>>>>>>>>>THREE (AS >I SEE IT.)
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >(6) is very interesting. Something I teach, is to say
    >>>>>>>>>>>"stop harder". >What is someone
    >>>>>>>>>>> >doing when they think "stop harder"? Hopefully they're
    >>>>>>>>>>>squeezing the >hand, which
    >>>>>>>>>>> >results in rotating the butt at the end of the stroke,
    >>>>>>>>>>>which is
    >>>>>>>>>>> >"proper power application". I THINK YOU ARE RIGHT. FLOYD
    >>>>>>>>>>>FRANKE
    >>>>>>>>>>>PUTS IT >THIS WAY WHEN HE TEACHES THIS : \"SQUEEZE TO A
    >>>>>>>>>>>STOP\". HELPS A LOT WITH >ACCURACY CASTING, TOO.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >I'd like to say I knew the answer here, but I don't.
    >>>>>>>>>>>The argument
    >>>>>>>>>>> >for an abrupt
    >>>>>>>>>>> >stop is that it gives a more efficient transfer of
    >>>>>>>>>>>energy from rod
    >>>>>>>>>>> >to line, but on a
    >>>>>>>>>>> >170 casting arc I reckon that most of that energy has
    >>>>>>>>>>>already been >transferred
    >>>>>>>>>>> >before the stop. Where's the stop on a swoop or a
    >>>>>>>>>>>thrust, for
    >>>>>>>>>>> >example?
    >>>>>>>>>>> >If it's at the end of thrust the rod's hit RSP,
    >>>>>>>>>>>energy's been
    >>>>>>>>>>> >transferred and you may as
    >>>>>>>>>>> >well drop the rod. YES. THIS IS GROUND UPON WHICH FEW
    >>>>>>>>>>>DARE TO TROD >!.......WE RISK BEING CALLED HERETICS. ON
    >>>>>>>>>>>THE SO-CALLED, \"THRUST
    >>>>>>>>>>> >CAST\" AS WELL AS THE, \"SWOOP\" IT DOES APPEAR THAT
    >>>>>>>>>>>YOU'VE
    >>>>>>>>>>>ALREADY >GONE PAST RSP. HERE, THE TRUE STOP IS WHEN, \"YOU
    >>>>>>>>>>>RUN OUT OF ARM\". OF >COURSE THE ROD IS STRAIGHT AT THE
    >>>>>>>>>>>END OF THE THRUST.....BUT THAT MAY >HAVE OCCURRED A SPLIT
    >>>>>>>>>>>SECOND EARLIER. I'VE SEEN LEFTY DEMO THIS AND >LITERALLY
    >>>>>>>>>>>DROP THE ROD ON THE GROUND AFTER THE THRUST. THE LOOP
    >>>>>>>>>>>SHOOTS >OUT WITH TREMENDOUS SPEED AND ITS DIRECTION IS
    >>>>>>>>>>>UNCHANGED. BEST NOT TO >TEACH THAT THRUST WIND CAST EXCEPT
    >>>>>>>>>>>TO ADVANCED CASTERS WHO HAVE ENOUGH
    >>>>>>>>>>> >CONTROL TO AVOID ELBOW INJURY.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Sorry I know this is not very good teaching for a study
    >>>>>>>>>>>group. Some >day we'll
    >>>>>>>>>>> >know everything and then we'll try our best to forget
    >>>>>>>>>>>it all.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Incidentally I find emphasising "power application" as
    >>>>>>>>>>>opposed to
    >>>>>>>>>>> >"stop" can have
    >>>>>>>>>>> >a more positive effect. Just a different way of getting
    >>>>>>>>>>>the same
    >>>>>>>>>>> >stroke nailed. I HOPE WE NEVER DO KNOW EVERYTHING ! IT
    >>>>>>>>>>>WOULD BE
    >>>>>>>>>>>LIKE >FINDING THE, \"NEVER-FAIL\" FLY. I DO SO LOVE
    >>>>>>>>>>>GETTING INTO SUPER >DETAIL....BUT I DON'T WANT OUR GROUP
    >>>>>>>>>>>TO LOSE SIGHT OF THE FOREST FOR >SAKE OF TOO MANY TREES.
    >>>>>>>>>>> > GORDY
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >PS I can't believe Tip Travel has already been
    >>>>>>>>>>>invented; we'll have >to come
    >>>>>>>>>>> >up with something different.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >PPS I shouldn't have eaten beans last night.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:13 PM
    >>>>>>>>>>> >Subject: Re: Actual demo of ESSENTIALS
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Paul....
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Interesting points.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>On 3.)....."Short cast: short stroke, Long cast: long
    >>>>>>>>>>>stroke" is,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>as we both know, a gross oversimplification. For the
    >>>>>>>>>>>long >>cast,
    >>>>>>>>>>>we >>need a long distance travel for the rod tip. We don't
    >>>>>>>>>>>need it for the >>short cast. Of course, this is tip
    >>>>>>>>>>>travel is produced by the >>combination of many things,
    >>>>>>>>>>>including rod arc (casting arc),
    >>>>>>>>>>>stroke >>length (as defined by the distance moved by the
    >>>>>>>>>>>hand) and, with >>very long casts, the caster's body
    >>>>>>>>>>>motion. Even a step forward >>during the delivery stroke
    >>>>>>>>>>>adds to that tip travel.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>(Incidentally, the first reference in the casting
    >>>>>>>>>>>literature I
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>could find was in J.C. Mottram's book, FLY CASTING,
    >>>>>>>>>>>originally >>published in 1921. So the term is a
    >>>>>>>>>>>resurrection not a new
    >>>>>>>>>>>coining.)
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>On 6.) One can have a whimpy stop (a mush) and still
    >>>>>>>>>>>get the fly
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>out there on target......but is that the most efficient
    >>>>>>>>>>>way to
    >>>>>>>>>>>do it >>?......I think not.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>I simply can't make anywhere near the distance on my
    >>>>>>>>>>>distance cast >>with a soft stop. Just can't do it !
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>You call attention to the concept of crisp application
    >>>>>>>>>>>of power.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Now if we have that anywhere in the stroke except in
    >>>>>>>>>>>juxtaposition to >>the stop, we have a spike of
    >>>>>>>>>>>power.......high liklihood of a tailing >>loop.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Having said that, I realize fully that there are many
    >>>>>>>>>>>casts which
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>are done well with hardly a stop, or even no real stop.
    >>>>>>>>>>>These
    >>>>>>>>>>>include >>certain curve casts such as the corkscrew cast,
    >>>>>>>>>>>the helicopter cast, >>and other decelerating curve
    >>>>>>>>>>>casts....in fact,
    >>>>>>>>>>>any >>purposely decelerated cast. It certainly includes
    >>>>>>>>>>>the, "no stop" of >>the back cast during what has been
    >>>>>>>>>>>called the, "European continuous >>tension cast" as well
    >>>>>>>>>>>as other elliptical casts including the >>so-called,
    >>>>>>>>>>>"Belgian cast".
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>As I happen to look at it, a crisp stop is an
    >>>>>>>>>>>essential for
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>so-labelled, "straight line overhead casting"......NOT
    >>>>>>>>>>>ALL
    >>>>>>>>>>>CASTING, >>BY ANY MEANS. If we look at it that way, you
    >>>>>>>>>>>are absolutely >>CORRECT.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Gordy
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>From: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Reply-To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>To: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Subject: Re: Actual demo of ESSENTIALS
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:19:38 -0000
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Hi Gordy,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>I've been thinking about the essentials listed below
    >>>>>>>>>>>and I don't
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>agree that [6] is an essential.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>I think what's really happening when a caster is
    >>>>>>>>>>>thinking about
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>making an abrupt stop
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>is that he's really making a crisp power application
    >>>>>>>>>>>[5]. There are >>quite a few "stopless" casting styles
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>including the TLT and Austrian style - which as you
    >>>>>>>>>>>know is how
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>most Continental Europeans cast.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>I know that runs contrary to much of what we teach but
    >>>>>>>>>>>many
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>distance casters don't use an
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>abrupt stop either but integrate drift/swoop into
    >>>>>>>>>>>their stroke. I >>just sort of flop the rod over
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>and hope.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>I used to think that the stop was the most important
    >>>>>>>>>>>thing in
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>flycasting, I now think it restricts
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>distance.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>I think [3] should be or include proper casting arc.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>I hope you're getting some good fishing.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > Group...
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > Following a suggestion by Molly Semenik, I have one
    >>>>>>>>>>>more >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >question on the 5 (or 6) ESSENTIALS.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > In your own words, describe what you would do to
    >>>>>>>>>>>demonstrate
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >clearly to a group of fly casting students, each
    >>>>>>>>>>>essential.
    >>>>>>>>>>>You may >> >use a fly outfit or any other teaching prop
    >>>>>>>>>>>or tool.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > 1.) Straight Line Path of Rod Tip - I have a short
    >>>>>>>>>>>(one foot)
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >section of a rod tip complete with tip top guide. It
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> enables
    >>>>>>>>>>>me to >> >hold the short section up to eye level and
    >>>>>>>>>>>while moving it
    >>>>>>>>>>>back >>and >forth as per casting strokes, I can use the
    >>>>>>>>>>>other hand to >>clearly >demonstrate the straight line
    >>>>>>>>>>>path by accompanying the rod >>tip with >the flat palm
    >>>>>>>>>>>of my other hand.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > 2.) Eliminate Slack - When teaching, I always
    >>>>>>>>>>>stress this very
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >early in the lesson. I have always liked and used
    >>>>>>>>>>>Lefty's >> way
    >>>>>>>>>>>of >> >putting this. With the line laying out about 30'
    >>>>>>>>>>>with a bit of >> >slack, he points to the fly and leader
    >>>>>>>>>>>and states: "Ain't nothing >> >gonna happen until that
    >>>>>>>>>>>fly starts to move." After stating that >> >fact, I
    >>>>>>>>>>>demonstrate how much of the back stroke is wasted pulling
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >out slack that was not removed. I also, to indicate
    >>>>>>>>>>>the
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>uselessness
    >>>>>>>>>>> >of slack in casting and to interject a little levity
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>as a
    >>>>>>>>>>>bit of an >ice breaker, use the analogy of a drunk
    >>>>>>>>>>>pulling a
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>chain down the
    >>>>>>>>>>> >street, when asked by a very proper lady, why he is
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>pulling
    >>>>>>>>>>>a chain, >he replies, "Lady, did you ever try pushing one
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>of these things?"
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > 3.) Short Line - Short Stroke, Long Line - Long
    >>>>>>>>>>>Stroke - I use
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >analogies here also. To indicate proper stroke
    >>>>>>>>>>>length, I
    >>>>>>>>>>>pantomine >> >throwing a line-drive baseball, which
    >>>>>>>>>>>requires a short straight line >> >throw/stroke for a
    >>>>>>>>>>>close throw and a longer
    >>>>>>>>>>>straight >>stroke for a >longer ball. I also have the
    >>>>>>>>>>>student watch the rod as >>I make longer >strokes while
    >>>>>>>>>>>adding line.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > 4.) Pause - I like to use the term -Timely Pause -
    >>>>>>>>>>>With >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >beginners I try to have them temporarily adapt to a 90%
    >>>>>>>>>>>stance
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>and >watch their back cast straighten (almost
    >>>>>>>>>>>straighten). >>This
    >>>>>>>>>>>has >>a >dual-fold purpose, as it allows them to see the
    >>>>>>>>>>>line trajectory >>and >often helps to keep their back
    >>>>>>>>>>>casts up where they belong. If >>the >individual has
    >>>>>>>>>>>trouble watching their back cast, I revert >>again to >one
    >>>>>>>>>>>of Lefty's old methods. I ask them where they are >>from,
    >>>>>>>>>>>and I >instruct them to make a back cast while pausing
    >>>>>>>>>>>long
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>enough to state
    >>>>>>>>>>> >their name and where they are from. It works like >>a
    >>>>>>>>>>>charm
    >>>>>>>>>>>on a 30' >cast.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > 5.) Proper Application of Power. - When explaining
    >>>>>>>>>>>power and
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >how to apply it, I have started to use a term that I
    >>>>>>>>>>>believe >> >our
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>own >Gordy has coined, and that is "An accelerated
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>acceleration
    >>>>>>>>>>>to a >> >stop", I have never heard it explained better.
    >>>>>>>>>>>For this all >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >important step I also use hands on guidance with
    >>>>>>>>>>>permission.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>There >are many analogies for this also, such as
    >>>>>>>>>>>driving in >>low
    >>>>>>>>>>>gear >>then >shifting to second and finally high.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > 6.) Abrupt Stop - When trying to explain the
    >>>>>>>>>>>importance of the
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >stop, I allude to the elite distance caster's (Steve
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> Rajeff)
    >>>>>>>>>>>words, >> >when he was asked: What do the best casters do
    >>>>>>>>>>>that
    >>>>>>>>>>>other's >>fail to >do? And he replied; "They stop the
    >>>>>>>>>>>rod." As to
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>demonstrating this, I >again like to, with permission
    >>>>>>>>>>>of
    >>>>>>>>>>>course, use >>hands on. It is a >wonderful way to have
    >>>>>>>>>>>the student actually feel >>the abruptness of >the
    >>>>>>>>>>>required stop. Here again there are many visual >>aids we
    >>>>>>>>>>>can >apply, throwing water at a wall off of a paint brush,
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>slinging an
    >>>>>>>>>>> >apple from a dowel rod and so on.
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> > Since I have a plethora of beginners here in the
    >>>>>>>>>>>Catskills, I
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >have printed out little cards (laminated) with the
    >>>>>>>>>>>essentials >> listed >and hand them out at the end of a
    >>>>>>>>>>>one day lesson. I
    >>>>>>>>>>>tell >> them to put >them in their wallet or purse and
    >>>>>>>>>>>refer to them if >> necessary when >they are practicing,
    >>>>>>>>>>>and then I always add; "You
    >>>>>>>>>>>do >>plan to >practice, don't you?"
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    > >>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >