[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Parallel loop legs / Physics v. Zen
- Subject: Parallel loop legs / Physics v. Zen
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:49:51 -0500
Walter & Group....
Note attachments: 1. Bruce Richard's
comments in Walter Simberski's text.
2.
Bruce's attachment: Rod flex-RSP.xls (Graph).
3.
Walter's & Bruce's comments.
4. Ally Gowan's diagram of PARALLEL LOOP LEGS (pdf)
5. Ally's
diagram of loop legs out of parallel. (pdf)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PARALLEL LOOP LEGS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Ally Gowans:
Hi
Gordy/Bruce,
I have attached a
couple of quick sketches of loops because I think that many people have some
difficulty discerning between “good” parallel loops and loops that are not
acceptable in tests. Of course the difficult part is knowing the finer points of
that judgement. Anyway for a start I have attached a couple of sketches of
loops, classic idealised examples and others. If you and Bruce can spare a
minute to look at them and make any comments that would be
appreciated.
Best
wishes,
Ally
Gowans
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ally
.... They are right on target !!! Well
done. Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Bruce Richards:
Hi Ally,
Nice drawings! I especially like the one of "parallel leg loops" (I'd
prefer we called them that, "parallel loops" isn't really accurate). I'd
like to see the "non-parallel leg loops" a bit more exaggerated, some are
quite close to parallel... I'd clearly show an exaggerated tailing loop,
big loop, and loop out of plane horizontally, from above....
Bruce
Scientific Anglers/3M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bruce... Good suggestion. An
exaggerated drawing would help make the point.
G.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PHYSICS / ZEN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message on our postings of fly casting physics by
Mac Brown My brief comments in red italics in his text G.
:-
Hi Gordy,
The posts have been interesting to say the least from Walter, Server,
Bruce, and Troy on the physics stuff. I respect all of their writings and think
many of their analogies are helpful for creating a deeper understanding of
casting. Big difference when looking at tip versus butt of the rod which is
understandable for some slight disagreement. I tend to come up with things more
from the Zen side of things as you say Gordy. The "what if" side of our
understanding of casting seems to come back to our physical understanding of the
complete system (physics).
I have a question regarding the rod tip that I think the group may
shed some light. Many of the posts presently talk about the theoretical RSP
(zero force in the rod) and state that it decelerates post RSP. I do not have
any such studies to prove other wise-but it seems to me that there may be an
instant that the counter-flex is still accelerating the line. The slow
motion videos seem to prove that the actual loop forms slightly after RSP. The
reason I think their is something post RSP is that the old bamboo and glass rods
become difficult to throw negative cast (underpowered curves). They are powerful
rods for roll casts, etc... and this is what got me thinking about posing the
question.
Last year, in Atlanta, we videoed multiple
casts with a high speed camera to try to challenge the concept of loop formation
beginning at RSP. We really could not see evidence of the loop
starting to form either before RSP or immediately following (during
counterflex.) This was done, however, at 100 fps. The results might
be different if done at 1000 fps or greater.
G.
Compare the RSP to wrist extension used for the line hauling hand. If we
begin our haul with Flexion in the line hand and conserve this rotation until
late in the stroke-it is like saying when the wrist becomes straight (in line
with forearm-similar to RSP of the rod) then the line hand no longer accelerates
the line. As you know, it is the point after RSP (wrist being straight) to when
the wrist uses extension that is the nitrous to the haul. Just like
conserveration of rotation late in the stroke. Why would the 3rd class lever
(rod) be any different? Imagine throwing a Frisbee without wrist extension?
If the counter-flex did not yield anything at all to acceleration then why do
more people not cast with broomsticks? Actually, I used many a short broomstick
about 15 years ago for some casting demos, not a pleasant thing to cast for long
periods.
I have the same opinion after doing the
same thing with my "broomstickrod".
G.
You had mentioned that much negativity has come about with the technical
jargon. I think that is ashame for any aspiring instructor to
disregard classic Newtonian principals. That would really stagnate ones
progression for becoming a more creative caster. I cannot think of a better
sport than fly casting to apply these principals for some thought provoking
insight. The self discovery of new casts including the "what if" approach to
practice is enhanced no doubt with a basic understanding of mechanics. It is a
vital part of the journey. It will in due time replace many of the myths and
fallacies that plague the sport of fly casting today. The change is slowly
coming. Some great stuff Gordy as usual the past week.
Cheers,
Mac Brown
Attachment:
Gordy3.doc
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
Rod flex-RSP.xls
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
Gordy1.doc
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
parallel_loops.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
out_of_parallel_loops.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document