[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • Angular acceleration



    Walter & Group.......

    From Walter Simberski :

    Gordy,
     
    I've added my comments to Eric's email in red.
     
    Walter
     
     

    In regards to angular acceleration:

    "# With rotatory motion there necessarily must always be acceleration, since a rotating object is constantly changing direction.

    One example is an airplane propeller. It may be rotating at a constant number of revolutions per second, yet it is always accelerating."

    A more precise statement would be "It may be rotating at a constant number of revolutions per second, yet it any given point
    on the propeller is always accelerating since it is constantly changing direction."
     
    This comes down to our chosen frame of reference for the system we are observing. If I look at the propeller strictly from a
    linear motion point of view then any point (with the exception of points on the axis of rotation) must be accelerating because
    they are constantly changing direction. If we look at the propeller system from the point of view of angular motion then once
    the propeller reaches a point of constant angular velocity the angular acceleration = 0. 
     
    This is one of the "simple" answers. I've been trying to avoid more complex concepts such as the fact that angular velocity
    isn't a true vector but rather a pseudovector 

    I’m really not sure what you are saying here("must always be acceleration"). Unless you are talking about something like Coriolis acceleration or centripetal acceleration, angular velocity can be constant (angular acceleration = 0).

    Centripetal acceleration is correct in this case and is one of the other "simple" answers. A discussion of centripetal and centrifugal forces
    would be an excellent addendum to the casting physics articles...
     
    Walter

    Eric