[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • Terms / teaching



    Walter & Group.....

    From Jim Penrod on confusing terminology:

    Hi Gordy,
       For me when it comes to positive and negative curve cast I like to describe a negative curve as one in which the curve

    is lateral or away from my casting arm and a positive curve is just the opposite or the curve is medial or to the inside of my casting arm.
    That avoids having to deal with left and right. I think of decelerating and accelerating with more to do with the mechanics of making a
     positive or negative curve cast. One, could, of course, make either a positive or negative curve by either accelerating or decelerating
    depending upon rod plane, i.e., a negative curve cast by rapid acceleration, wrist twist and rapid stop in the across the head almost
    vertical plane. Just my way of looking at it.
    Jim

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    From Jeff Barefoot on placing emphasis on the back cast as a teaching priority.  Perhaps we can have some feedback from those of you who have an opinion on this :-

    My teaching experience has been also like Troy’s. A majority in favor of

    getting back casts down quicker. I wonder why the bias is different between

    different instructors? It be interesting to know what bias all the members

    of this group experience.

    Jeff Barefoot

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

    As I think you know,  my way of looking at it is that the back cast is extremely important to learn well, early.  It is the set up for the forward cast.  Using different words, you are not likely to have an efficient forward cast unless it is preceeded by a good back cast.

    Reminds me of the article written a couple of years ago by Bob Andreae entitled, "YOUR MOST IMPORTANT CAST".   Of course, he was talking about the back cast.

    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

    One of my messages just before Christmas (I see that not all of you received it.) :-


     Group.........


    As I think about it, I note that one of the things which makes the detailed understanding of the many factors which go into the formation of an almost straight line path of the rod tip and the formation of a tight loop, is the fact that we are taking a combination of translational and (mostly) rotatory movements at the rod handle and using them to create an almost pure linear (translational) movement at the end of a flexible fly rod.


    Then when we see the tremendous differences in the flexibility of various fly rods and the differences in application of power  as we cast, it comes to me as amazing that we can do it at all let alone figure out how we did it !


    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Answer from Bob Tabbert:

    Gordy,your message is  a beautiful discription of this wonderful art form of casting..my only comment is that we really still do not understand the whole process, Richards and Perkins have pushed the envelope, I am hanging on by my finger nails...have a great 2008 , thanks again for your hard work and guidance in helping  all of us who are seeking knowledge and understanding  of the casting process...Bob

    Robert L. Tabbert
    Conservation, Fly Fishing, Exploration
    Winter: 211 Ursuline St,
    Lafayette, LA 70506 
    Summer: N14925,W Turner Lk Rd
    Lac du Flambeau, WI 54538 715 588 2395

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    From Mack Martin Jr. (Atlanta Fly Casting School) on the Casting Analyzer:-

    Gordy:
     
    While there are minor deficiencies and limitations with the casting analyzer, using the analyzer will make you a better caster and it has proven to be a terrific teaching tool. Bruce never over sold the product or made any claims that could not be achieved and in fact the analyzer has worked flawlessly for us.
     
    We saw the analyzer in its early stages back in 2003 and have always been impressed with this equipment. I have seen a number of good casters who became much better casters as a result of using the casting analyzer. It gets an A+ from our school.
     
    Mack

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~