Walter & Group........
I WILL BE AWAY FOR ABOUT A WEEK STARTING AT NOON, TODAY. GORDY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Ally Gowans:-
Hi
Gordy,
Attached file will open
with Windows Media or you can place into Power Point etc. Its an attempt to
illustrate how a fly line, travelling at its max velocity passes the fly rod and
show how the line shape nearest the rod tip will during its slack period as the
fly line passes be altered by the rod counter flex until the mass of the fly
line overtakes and starts to change the loop shape – or morph as they say.
Shooting heads I suggest make tighter loops because the running line puts fewer
impediments on the fly line as tension increases.
Comments?
Best
wishes,
Ally Gowans
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments: Note the diagrams in Ally's attachment. I think this is a very clear depiction of what happens with straight line casting.
My own take is that the dip in the rod leg of the loop does have a lot to do with counterflex. I think that a combination of forces result in what Paul Arden referred to as, "sucking it up" as the rod leg began to straighten. Seems to me that rebound after counterflex would aid in this ....plus the tension created between the traveling loop and the rod tip which would differ depending upon whether or not the line is shot in which cast the rod leg would have velocity and (since it also has mass), inertia.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More on this from Ally:
Hi Gordy,
Just a comment on Paul
talking about the line being sucked out as the loop travels. It’s the line that
has the energy and the loop is the result of retardation of the line by tension
from the rod tip. The loop does not pull the fly line forward, it holds it back
and by doing so prevents the line becoming disorganised – as you found happened
when you cut the backing and let go completely. The rod leg of the line has no
velocity it comes to a standstill as the line travelling forward turns over but
it has tension. The fly leg has velocity and experiences the same tension via
the loop.
The shooting line the
rod leg has velocity after line is released (shot) and that should be after the
line loop has formed because by then we would have tension enough to pull out
the running line and the heavy running line can indeed have sufficient kinetic
energy to pull it a long way. If line is released during the period when the
tension has disappeared immediately after the rod tip max velocity, either a
poor or no line loop results - we have all seen this early release too
often!
Best
wishes,
Ally
Gowans
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ally.... I'll have to think a bit longer on your statement, "The loop does not pull the fly line forward, it holds it back....."
If I cut the fly line at its connection with the backing, the loop travels a long way forward and carries what is left of the rod leg of the line along with it. Either that, or the entire fly line / loop / fly leg & cut rod leg all function as a unit moving against atmospheric resistance. The fact that the loop doesn't unroll much in that situation, suggests that this is because the tension between the moving loop and the stationary rod tip has been eliminated.
I'll not comment further on that concept until I given it more consideration.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachment:
rod and line loop.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document