[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Casting into the wind .... Question
- Subject: Casting into the wind .... Question
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:11:24 -0500
Walter & Group:
My answer follows Bob Rumpf's
questions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Gordy & group,
I have a question about one of the sample questions in the Master's Study Guide.
Under Appendix D - Representative Questions - Casting - there is a question that
asks: Describe various methods of casting into the wind.
Considering the way the question is worded, with the definitive word
obviously being into, I can only assume they mean a head wind.
Although we have discussed many times about making a high back cast to take
advantage of the wind to "kite" the back cast and follow it with an accelerated,
tight loop front cast aimed directly at the target, it seems to be the only one
we discussed. In reality, the only way I can think of, or even heard of, casting
into the wind is in this manner. Although I have many ways of dealing with
wind from the casting side and several casts to cope with a tailwind, I only
have the one mentioned for a head wind. Am I missing something.
Also, not to be argumentative, but I remember a recent discussion about the wind
speed being less at the surface of the water, and how that no longer applies
since new research has been applied. I of course do not doubt the results
of the research as it may have applied to the scenario of that test. However, as
a long time guide, fly casting and fly fishing instructor on freestone
trout rivers and streams here in the Catskills, I can tell you first-hand that
crouching (along with other appropriate casting adjustments) to get below the
wind when you have an 8 foot high bank behind you is a very sensible
additional approach to coping with the wind.
Regards,
Bob Rumpf
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bob...
Valid questions. You have just tackled
my very favorite subject.....casting in howling winds.
Let's tackle them seperately:
1. You have given a very good description of
a method of casting into a head wind. I don't fault it at
all. That's a good SHORT ANSWER.
If asked to go into more detail, you could
point out the variations over which one has control with respect to head and
tail wind casting. ie:
a. Loop control (Tight on the
forward cast, wider on the back cast )
b. Trajectory (Launch angle or line
plane) (High on back cast, lower on forward cast with 180 degrees between
the two, forward cast directed to the target rather than above it.)
c. Loop speed (Greater on the
forward cast, less on the back cast.)
d. Increased rod load on the forward
delivery cast.
e. Change of timing between
forward and back casts. (More time for the loop to unroll on the back
cast, less for the forward cast.)
d. When false casting, carrying less
line until the final back cast. (Vice versa when casting with a tail
wind.)
If asked, that is one way to teach it. By
breaking the solution into various components like this, it serves a good
comparison to go further in teaching to cast with a strong wind from behind, for
example. (This also pre-empts the next question which might be, "how do
you teach it."
2. You could, also, have added a description
of the, "Lefty Kreh Wind Cast" also known as the, "Storm Cast" (by
Charles Ritz) and the, "Thrust Cast" (by Gary and Jason Borger). As you
probably know, this adds a thrust at the conclusion of the delivery cast such
that you don't stop until your elbow is extended as you, "run out of arm".
Done properly, this can generate tremendous loop speed while maintaining a tight
loop.
3. The answers, above would probably
suffice. If the examiners interpreted the word, "methods" more broadly,
they might be looking for other things which would help with casting into the
wind such as changes in equipment, ie:
a. More dense fly line (smaller
diameter = less wind resistance)
b. Going to a fly line of
different design (Such as a short steep forward taper or a shooting
head)
c. Shorter leader
d. Smaller, less bulky
fly
d. Increasing to a higher
system. (Such as going from a 4 wt. outfit to a 7 wt.)
4. You could even get into a discussion of finding
and taking advantage of wind breaks. (This would rarely be
necessary) . You are correct that a good high wind break behind you does
diminish even a wind blowing toward you.
5. Once in a while, while surf fly casting on a
gusty day, we time our presentation cast to intervals between
gusts.
6. There are rare instances when I will make
a super low side arm cast into a wind from literally below the deck of my flats
skiff with the loop traveling only a few inches above the wave tops. This
DOES work for short distances.
7. One highly specialized wind cast for into
the wind presentation has recently been described by Joe Mulson. Basically
you strike the water with the line at high speed in such a manner that the line
unrolls on the water with the loop just above it timed to turn over just before
the target.
Gordy