[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
[SPAM] Shane's critique of past message on casting mechanics
- Subject: [SPAM] Shane's critique of past message on casting mechanics
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:34:41 -0400
Walter
& Group :
Shane:
All this is
becoming more clear.
We must also
(as you stated in your message) realize that there has to be a change in
parameters based upon the fact that the rod tip isn't moving alone.....but is
doing so against the inertia of the fly line.
Your critique
of your own statements shows that you are giving this material a lot of good
thought !
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gordy,
After tossing
the following statement in the mix, and thinking it through further, I
anticipate that what I said below might be controversial. So if no one else has,
let me be the first to jump on it! Certainly it paints an incomplete
picture.
So how
fast the rod is loaded is ultimately not relevant to how deeply
it is loaded. We could bend [the
rod] back by slowly pulling the tip and holding it (like a bow and
arrow cast). When we are casting normally, though, it just so happens that
we bend the rod by
accelerating the rod butt and the tip against the inertia of the line. But like
an archery bow, it is not how fast we pull the bow back, just how deeply we pull
it. [how fast we do it really relates to the velocity of the rod tip imparted by
the casting stroke. ]
First lets look at a simple spring with a
mass attached, traveling in two dimensions. The system response of the spring
when it is released depends on the mass, stiffness of the spring, and how far we
deflect the spring from its resting point, but not how long it took or even how
jerkily we did it. In other words, the potential
energy stored in the loaded rod could have built up slowly or quickly;
regardless, how it is released will be the same. So in a simplistic view,
what happens to the rod when it unloads doesn't depend on how it was
loaded. Additionally, the effect of the rod unloading affects the line after the
rod butt is stopped and is reflected in how the line turns over and the lower
[rod] leg of the loop.
But how we load the rod is important
in the velocity and path the rod tip travels during the loading phase up to the
stop. That is the rod must be loaded smoothly [constant rate of acceleration] to
get a smooth nearly straight path of the rod tip. This effects the line before
the stop and this is reflected in the upper leg of the
loop.
Certainly this oversimplifies or ignores other factors
of the cast such as rod orientation, but it I think
it provides insight into certain aspects of the cast. Although
continuous parts of the casting, by breaking it down in the loading and
unloading phases, helps understand why we want to load the rod smoothly and
deeply not fast and hard [to use imprecise terms]. It also helps me visualize
better what affects the formation of the upper and lower legs of the loop as
Bruce had described it in his casting analysis workshops.
Shane