[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • FW: Re: STOP?








     


    From: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Reply-To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: "Jeff Wagner" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    CC: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re: STOP?
    Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:45:22 -0000
    "For someone that
    doesnt get good rod bend a 180 degree arc gives terrible wide loops."

    Well Jeff, it would have to be a pretty impressive rod bend to get a SLP through
    180 degree casting arc.

    I think translational rod movement helps in distance, but it's certainly not
    an essential.

    Gotta run, Board problems.
    Cheers,
    Paul

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 3:32 AM
    Subject: Re: STOP?


    >Obviously we are interpreting these things differently, I dont
    >agree.
    >
    >Matching the casting arc to rod bend is having a straight line path
    >to the rod
    >tip which gives a good loop. I think in a distance cast you
    >definitely have
    >matched the casting arc to rod bend if you didnt we would have some
    >other loop
    >shape. I dont think that SLP is "something that just happens", I
    >think it is
    >to complex to give that kind of a generalized statement. For
    >someone that
    >doesnt get good rod bend a 180 degree arc gives terrible wide loops.
    >
    >I agree that they are a filter, and a good one. But, I dont see
    >anything in a
    >distance stroke that does not follow them. As I outlined below. I
    >see the 5
    >essentials as Mr. Jaworski wrote about them and that is also how I
    >teach them. That the product of the cast is the proof of them. That
    >most casting faults lie
    >within them. If I have a perfectly executed distance cast with
    >good loop shape
    >all of the essentials are followed as I pointed out below.
    >
    >1. Straight line path of the rod tip = tight loop
    >2. progressive speed up to a stop = tight loop
    >3. long stroke easier cast = tight loop and the stroke can be
    >longer than
    >necessary
    >4. tension in the casting system = tight loop
    >
    >I may be simplifying things a bit, but those are things that are
    >actually
    >happening.
    >
    >When I watch a great distance caster like Hartman this weekend at
    >the Sacramento
    >ISE show.
    >He had
    >1. Tension in the system
    >2. tight loops, as you pointed out from a SLP
    >3. A very progressive speed up to a stop punctuated by a very rapid
    >rotation
    >giving great angular velocity resulting in excellent acceleration
    >4. A long stroke that matched the distance being cast if it were to
    >short it
    >would have tailed, if it is to long, there is no adverse effect,
    >only more
    >energy used than necessary.
    >
    >--
    >Jeff Wagner
    >
    >Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly Fishers
    >Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >Redington Pro Staff
    >970-481-5887
    >jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >www.dhflyfishing.com
    >
    >
    >Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >
    >>OK, Jeff, if you knock out the SLP as being an action and
    >>result of the other 4, and instead consider it something that
    >>just happens in a 170/180 stroke (and it must be flat at some point
    >>since the loop is top pointed) then you've also eliminated matching
    >>the casting arc to rod bend.
    >>
    >>All you're left with is power application, elimination of slack
    >>and proper timing.
    >>
    >>Don't misunderstand me, Bill's 5 Essentials are the product of a
    >>brilliant mind (which is quite surprising since Bill's
    >>from Texas), and there is nothing quite like them, especially
    >>combined with Bruce's six steps, but they're not "essentials"
    >>in the true sense, they're simply a "filter" you can apply over any
    >>straight line cast and the more "essentials" you create the
    >>easier it becomes to break the filter.
    >>
    >>I find it interesting that if you have 5 essentials the most
    >>important is the SLP and the others are components necessary for
    >>this to occur. If you have one essential
    >>it is proper power application. FWIW I don't think stroke length is
    >>an essential. The correct essential that makes sense in this case
    >>is casting arc.
    >>
    >>Cheers,
    >>Paul
    >>
    >>
    >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:13 PM
    >>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>
    >>
    >>>Alright you baited me in.
    >>>
    >>>What other two essentials are not met by this.
    >>>
    >>>In a distance cast we have (in no particular order):
    >>>
    >>>1. Fly line follows the path of the rod tip. Which as stated in
    >>>a distance
    >>>cast the fly line follows the path of the rod tip. Which it does
    >>>in a distance
    >>>cast, I lift in my final back cast and come forward hard rotating
    >>>at the end to
    >>>give me a straight line path of the tip and some counter flex
    >>>which can pull
    >>>the bottom leg of the loop down to give a wedge.
    >>>
    >>>2. Long stroke easier cast. No problem there, need a long
    >>>stroke!
    >>>
    >>>3. Progrssive speed up to a stop (I combine those for my
    >>>teaching), again both
    >>>true I have to have a progressive speed up or acceleration to a
    >>>stop (dont
    >>>start on the stop again!lol)
    >>>
    >>>4. Tension in the system. For sure, any slack would be
    >>>disastrous for
    >>>distance, and even a slight amount minimizes the best distance
    >>>cast (dont start
    >>>on slack, in my definition it is the most efficient path for the
    >>>fly line to
    >>>take, usually a perfectly straight line).
    >>>
    >>>--
    >>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>
    >>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly Fishers
    >>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>970-481-5887
    >>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>
    >>>>Hiya Jeff,
    >>>>
    >>>>No I was reading this bit:
    >>>>
    >>>>"And I can make a crisp stop without any rotation at all, I can
    >>>>make
    >>>>>>wtih simply
    >>>>>>linear movement"
    >>>>
    >>>>That's a tail.
    >>>>
    >>>>Hard to imagine SLP on a 170 arc but I agree it's in there
    >>>>somewhere. So much for matching casting arc to rod bend.
    >>>>It must just happen, which is handy. Sort of means you don't
    >>>>have to worry about it and can just flop over as far and as fast
    >>>>as possible. There goes another two essentials by the way...
    >>>>
    >>>>Cheers,
    >>>>Paul
    >>>>
    >>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:07 AM
    >>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>>You misread the e-mail Paul. I stated that if you continued to
    >>>>>rotate through
    >>>>>you would have a wide loop, which means you are creating a domed
    >>>>>path to the
    >>>>>rod, not a dipped down path.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>I agree about the 170 degree arc, but the reason is you have a
    >>>>>straight line
    >>>>>path to the rod tip, or roughly so. I have an almost 170 degree
    >>>>>arc as do
    >>>>>several other casters I have watched video. I think you will
    >>>>>notice a great
    >>>>>deal of them have an initial slight lift after the drift which
    >>>>>brings the tip
    >>>>>to a level that as the forward motiona and rotation occur allow
    >>>>>for a stright
    >>>>>line path. Then a slight elevated forward trajectory to
    >>>>>accomodate for line
    >>>>>drop as the line unrolls. Of course all rod paths are not
    >>>>>exactly straight at
    >>>>>the end of the stroke (as shown my Al Kyte), they are slightly
    >>>>>domed at the
    >>>>>end.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>--
    >>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>I don't understand Jeff, if you don't rotate the loop tails.
    >>>>>>But yes, you certainly can do this. You're right, it wouldn't
    >>>>>>be very competitive.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Wrong link - I do that sometimes:
    >>>>>>http://www.sexyloops.com/movies/shuffle.shtml You don't get a
    >>>>>>wide loop with a Hartman 170 or 180 arc, which is of course
    >>>>>>quite interesting and means there's a shortfall in our
    >>>>>>understanding which we hope to fix soon.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 3:33 PM
    >>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>The link didnt take me to any video.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>And I can make a crisp stop without any rotation at all, I can
    >>>>>>>make wtih simply
    >>>>>>>linear movement. Obviously that isnt the best case scenario
    >>>>>>>for distance.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Rotation certainly adds A LOT OF SPEED. And a crisp stop
    >>>>>>>helps. I dont think
    >>>>>>>that is debatable. I can have great rotation without ever
    >>>>>>>exatually stopping
    >>>>>>>the rod but continuing through with the rotation in which case
    >>>>>>>I would end up
    >>>>>>>with a wide loop. I think there is more to it, as I have
    >>>>>>>outline. But not
    >>>>>>>sure we are getting any further.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>Sure I stop the rod, but by the time I've stopped the energy
    >>>>>>>>has been transferred. Dunno which video you're looking at but
    >>>>>>>>the
    >>>>>>>>most recent is
    >>>>>>>>http://www.sexyloops.com/movies/shufflecast/shuffle.mpg
    >>>>>>>>Interesting contrast to
    >>>>>>>>http://www.sexyloops.com/movies/distancecast/distancecast2.mpg
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>"The problem with your description is that is
    >>>>>>>>>not always true. In a very short cast the angle could be a
    >>>>>>>>>90."
    >>>>>>>>In which case it's not a stopless cast.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>I'm not arguing that a crisp stop isn't a good thing; I think
    >>>>>>>>it often is but
    >>>>>>>>not because of "efficient energy transfer", but rather
    >>>>>>>>because the crisp
    >>>>>>>>stop is preceded by sharp butt rotation and that's the key.
    >>>>>>>>The stop is
    >>>>>>>>a stop, for many years I fell into the trap of mixing butt
    >>>>>>>>stop with butt rotation.
    >>>>>>>>I think that's what you are doing now.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:55 AM
    >>>>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Paul,
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>I think we are on the same track no matter how much of what
    >>>>>>>>>I say you agree,
    >>>>>>>>>because about half of what you are saying doesnt make any
    >>>>>>>>>sense to me.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Power application is just that, the application of power.
    >>>>>>>>>Energy transfer is
    >>>>>>>>>just that the transfer of energy. I can hold a rod in mind
    >>>>>>>>>hand that is loaded
    >>>>>>>>>full of energy because I applied a force to the rod to make
    >>>>>>>>>it move and then
    >>>>>>>>>applied a force (energy) to make it stop. It is at this
    >>>>>>>>>point where the rod
    >>>>>>>>>butt has stopped that the rod tip can unflex and the energy
    >>>>>>>>>can transfer into
    >>>>>>>>>the rod. The application part has stopped (in a physical
    >>>>>>>>>sense of me applying
    >>>>>>>>>force tot he rod) and now the energy stored in the bent rod
    >>>>>>>>>is being release..
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>The way I see it in my minds eye the angle is acute with the
    >>>>>>>>>butt of the rod
    >>>>>>>>>and the fly line. The tip of the rod could be pointed
    >>>>>>>>>forward, the butt toward
    >>>>>>>>>the caster and the fly line would be attached to the tip and
    >>>>>>>>>pointing in the
    >>>>>>>>>same direction as the butt toward the caster. In this
    >>>>>>>>>description Yes the more
    >>>>>>>>>straight the rod becomes the more energy has been
    >>>>>>>>>transfered. I agree with
    >>>>>>>>>that. I said that in several previous e-mails by stating
    >>>>>>>>>that as the rod
    >>>>>>>>>unflexes the energy is released. The problem with your
    >>>>>>>>>description is that is
    >>>>>>>>>not always true. In a very short cast the angle could be a
    >>>>>>>>>90.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Of course rod rotation and rod unbending give more energy
    >>>>>>>>>and speed to the cast,
    >>>>>>>>>that is not debatable. An angular rotation at any velocity
    >>>>>>>>>is a continuous
    >>>>>>>>>acceleration which gives a great load to the rod but also
    >>>>>>>>>increases line speed
    >>>>>>>>>dircetly.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Of the video of you distace casting that I have seen on the
    >>>>>>>>>website and last
    >>>>>>>>>year at the conclave. I thought I saw a stop. It may not
    >>>>>>>>>be the classic stop
    >>>>>>>>>that youa re thinking of but there is definitley a quick
    >>>>>>>>>deceleration.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>>>I disagree with about half of what you've written below.
    >>>>>>>>>>Power application is the transfer of energy from hand to
    >>>>>>>>>>rod butt.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>The only thing I can add to anything I've written earlier
    >>>>>>>>>>is this:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>As the angle the butt makes to the line becomes acute,
    >>>>>>>>>>ie approaches zero, the load on the tip diminishes,
    >>>>>>>>>>the rod straightens and transfers energy to the line.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>I believe this results in a higher tip speed and not lower
    >>>>>>>>>>since tip speed has now become a combination of
    >>>>>>>>>>rod rotation and rod unbending and not rod unbending alone.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>For what it's worth I use a stopless cast for distance.for
    >>>>>>>>>>seven weights and below. I don't have the strength to
    >>>>>>>>>>do it with heavier lines.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:47 PM
    >>>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>I think we are saying the exact same thing. Power
    >>>>>>>>>>>application is energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>transfer. If the power application is over a longer
    >>>>>>>>>>>period of time then it is
    >>>>>>>>>>>a longer energy dissipation. Power application and energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>go hand in hand. The pooint of a power application is to
    >>>>>>>>>>>transfer energy from our body to the
    >>>>>>>>>>>rod and to the fly line. If we are talking specifically
    >>>>>>>>>>>about rod unload the
    >>>>>>>>>>>energy is being transfered to the fly line from the rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>>If we are talking
    >>>>>>>>>>>about a classic power application meaning the speed up to
    >>>>>>>>>>>a stop we are
    >>>>>>>>>>>applying energy. But in a lazy stop the dissipation is
    >>>>>>>>>>>occuring over a longer
    >>>>>>>>>>>period of time. To this I mean that there is only so much
    >>>>>>>>>>>energy that will be
    >>>>>>>>>>>transfered to the fly line as the rod unflexes. If this
    >>>>>>>>>>>happens quick a great
    >>>>>>>>>>>deal of energy will be transfered to the line in an
    >>>>>>>>>>>effective instant when the
    >>>>>>>>>>>line is begining to move beyond the rod. If I were to
    >>>>>>>>>>>exagerate this movement
    >>>>>>>>>>>by decelerating slowly the fly line could continue to move
    >>>>>>>>>>>forward while I move
    >>>>>>>>>>>the rod down or to the side slightly, with a short cast
    >>>>>>>>>>>the line could
    >>>>>>>>>>>completely unroll before I have stopped the rod fully. If
    >>>>>>>>>>>the line unrolls
    >>>>>>>>>>>fully and then I fully stop by a continual deceleration no
    >>>>>>>>>>>effective energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>would be transfered. In which my timing sucks. If I
    >>>>>>>>>>>would have stopped the
    >>>>>>>>>>>rod more abruptly then the energy would have been used
    >>>>>>>>>>>more effectively.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>I am not sure how you can say power application is the
    >>>>>>>>>>>problem. In the classic
    >>>>>>>>>>>sense of the word the power application is getting the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>to bend. If we are
    >>>>>>>>>>>taling about a deceleration (lazy stop) then the power
    >>>>>>>>>>>application is already
    >>>>>>>>>>>over. However, since power application is such a broad
    >>>>>>>>>>>term it could be used
    >>>>>>>>>>>to describe the power applied to create the stop. As
    >>>>>>>>>>>could energy, we could
    >>>>>>>>>>>say energy has to be applied to the rod to make it stop.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>I am not sure where we are going with this?
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of Fly
    >>>>>>>>>>>Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>I disagree that the "problem" with a lazy stop is energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>transfer.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>It may be power application, it may be tip path, but it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>is not
    >>>>>>>>>>>>energy transfer.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>"A very rapid
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration more effectively transfers the energy into
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>the fly line, because
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>it is a over a short period of time."
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>The transfer of energy is not time dependent.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>>>>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:44 PM
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>The enregy that is transfered anytime very rarely stays
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>in one from. While a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>great deal of energy would be a movement a kinetic
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>energy as most know it. It
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>will still produce some heat and some sound (possibly)
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>although they may be
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>very minimal the transfer is not 100% motion. Friction
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>between the fibers,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>much like friction between uscle fibers, will create
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>some heat. You asked what
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>type of energy I guess I misread the problem.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>What I was trying to convey is that wether a very long
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration or a very
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>short deceleration (stop as we think of it), energy is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>still transfered from
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>the flexed rod to the fly line as the rod unflexes
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>propelling the line forward.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>The difference between these decelerations is how much
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>of the energy would be
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>usable to efficiently propelling the fly line forward.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>A very rapid
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration more effectively transfers the energy into
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>the fly line, because
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>it is a over a short period of time. This concept is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>similar to the timig of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>the release of the haul. I will not describe as I think
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>we could get off on
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>another tangent as that is another greatly debated
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>topic. But it is more
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>effective releasing at one time during the stroke. The
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>same could be said for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>the stop and the transfer of energy from the rod to the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>fly line. A slow
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration releases the energy over a longer period of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>time with less energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>being trasnfered at any one instant, thus transfering
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>less energy into the fly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>line at any one instance.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>"The energy would be in the form of heat, movemenet,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>sound (very
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>little)."
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Are you saying the rod gets hotter with a lazy stop?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Movement I can understand, the energy is dissipated
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>from rod to line
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>or better stated, transferred.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's how I understand it anyway.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:48 AM
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eergy dissipated on a lazy stop is simply dissipated
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>over a longer period of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>time and less of the energy would be transfered and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>used in prepolling the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>line. The energy would be in the form of heat,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>movemenet, sound (very little).
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But to me its not what it is transferred as but when,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it is the timing. If I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cast 40 feet of line and make two consecutive casts 1
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with a solid stop and the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>other with a longer stop a wider loop would form and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>less line speed would be
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>achieved. I think this can be shown definitely
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>through casting, but also
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>through the casting analyzer which measures those
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>variables. Of course it is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>possible to cast 40 feet with with no actual stop and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a very long decelerationa
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>dn get good results because it is very easy to achieve
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that much power on such a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>short line, but that is not the point of the exercise.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On your second poit that a decleration occurs before a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop. Of course that is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>true. I dont think that is a revelation! You have to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>decelerate to stop. A
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>car doesnt just cese to move some energy must be put
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>into making it slow down
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to a stop. The same is true of the casting arm and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fly rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>When I mentioned maximum tip velocity below it was a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>maximum tip velocity before
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>any sort of deceleration had occured to make the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>unflex. Which has to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>happen. There is no cast where a cast is made with no
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>help from the fly rod by
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>going from a flexed state to an unflexed state. The
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration may be very
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>slow and add very little but it still happens.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In the swoop it may all be one fluid motion and it may
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not have a solid stop. But, in order for a RSP to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>occur a deceleration of the hand must occur which
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>allows the rod tip a nd fly line to begint overcome
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the lower section of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rod and the hand. The hand may not be stopped, or the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>butt for that matter,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>but a deceleration has occured.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>When you say butt, do you mean the very bottom of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rod below the hand. I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>know this sounds stupid. But if that is the case then
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I would say that the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop is almost imperceptable and we are seeing a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>follow through. Similar to a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>motion in a drift. I think this happens almost every
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>great casters cast. However, a massive deceleration
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>has occured to allow the ro to get to RSP then
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a follow through.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There are a couple of things I don't agree with
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>below:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>" quicker
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration means a greater amount of energy would
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>be transferred more quickly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>into the flyline and less of it would be dissipated
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>after its effectiveness in
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the cast."
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How do you see energy being dissipated on a "lazy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop"? And in what form?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"But the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop IS the point of energy transfer from rod to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>line and does impart more
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy into the cast than would be lost from
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>counterflex or other ineffective
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>motions associated with the stop when done properly.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>When the rod is unbending it is transferring energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>from rod to line, this begins
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>when the rod butt is being decelerated/angle of line
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to rod becomes acute.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This *always* occurs prior to butt stop.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"The deceleration would be after a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>maximum tip velocity and the inability of the caster
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to maintain an
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>acceleration, an action caused by the caster
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>intentionally slowing the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(stopping) or unintentionally from running out of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>arm"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Maximum tip velocity occurs at Rod Straight Position
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>which normally
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>occurs after the stop, but in some cases can occur
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>during the stroke
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(making the stop a non-essential)..
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The swoop stroke I am thinking of, pulls down with no
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>butt rotation,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rotates the butt around a fixed point and then drives
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>upward,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pointing the rod in the direction of the cast.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's all one fluid motion. RSP occurs before butt
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I know the recognised theory, Jeff, but I don't think
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it's complete.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Wagner"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cc: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 4:49 AM
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A minor point. You can have a stopless cast. But
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>every cast has a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration. even if that deceleration is over a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>long period of time or large
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>distance.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IF I understand your description properly there is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>still a deceleration in the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rod at the end of the stroke or in this case when
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>170 degrees is attained. Any
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration from a maximum tip velocity will cause
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the tip to straighten. And
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>consequently energy to transfer from the rod to the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fly line. Since it is the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tip that is unbending and has the motion most of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy would be expelled
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>through the tip. The amount of energy that would go
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>into the cast would depend
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>on several variables including the time of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration, a quicker
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration means a greater amount of energy would
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>be transfered more quickly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>into the flyline and less of it would be dissipated
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>after its effectiveness in
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the cast. Timing!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If your debate is when is the rod straightening it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is during/after a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration, not necessarily a stop. The
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration would be after a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>maximum tip velocity and the inability of the caster
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to maintain an
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>acceleration, an action caused by the caster
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>intentionally slowing the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(stopping) or unintentionally from running out of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>arm. Both have a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration. I would call attention to Steve
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rajeff and other tournament
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>style casters where the the stop is the defining
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mark between a good caster and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>great caster. Again, timing of the release would
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have something to do with this
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>but also energy transfer. A longer stop has more
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>time to transfer energy and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>losing its effective timing.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are contending that the majority of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy has been transfered before
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the stop. I would say that definitely some of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy has been imparted to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the rod as the line is pulled through the air, if
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this were not the case the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>line would not be moving. Once the line is in
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>motion it will continue at the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>speed of the tip, decreasing after energy is no
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>longer being imparted to the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>line in which case it is effected by gravity, air
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>resistance, etc. But the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop IS the point of energy transfer from rod to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>line and does impart more
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy into the cast than would be lost from
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>counterflex or other ineffective
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>motions associated with the stop when done properly.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As for the swoop. I dont doubt that it can be a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>very effective technique. However, that doesnt mean
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything about the rod not stopping or decelerating.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If we are using the same term for swoop, meaning a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>dipped down path to the hand
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in the middle of the stroke to ensure a straight
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>path to the tip of the rod. A
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>maximum deceleration would occur at the end of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stroke and energy transfered
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to the fly line. I dont think that this is the most
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>effective technique as it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>means less bend in the rod is happening than for a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>caster that is moving the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hand in a arcing motion or even a straight line (if
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>both casters are using the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>same rod and similar stroke length). But, if it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>works for the guy who cares.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As I said in an earlier e-mail style is very
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>individual and there is more than
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>one to get the job done. I have been told recently
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that my style is not
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>appropriate either but I get decent results. Just
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not in pesky comps!!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I think I understand your discussion. The way I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>would break it down would be in
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>two parts. The old lever and spring concept (lever
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and flexiable lever).
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1. Lever (non-flexiable as an example) energy is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>imparted directly to the line
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as the line is pulled through the air. The line
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>will continue regarless of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop. The line will keep moving only slowing as the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>line is acted on by air
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>resistance, friction, etc. This could happen
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>regarless of the means of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>line being pulled, this is true since a flexed rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as it moves through the air
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is being flexed and is for this purpose not moving.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The same could be true for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a broomstick or even hand casting.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2. Spring. The point where the flexiable lever,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the rod, is unflexing and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transfering the energy to fly line, propelling it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>forward. The rod must flex
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and unflex to do this. I think this can be shown to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>be very effective by
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>having a flexed lever and unflexable lever cast next
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to each other. The
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>efficiency of the flexiable lever imparting energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to the fly line depends on
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>many factors is effecient enough to have a net
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>increase in energy.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Let me know if I am missing your point.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor, Federation
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of Fly Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoting Paul Arden <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi Jeff,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>my thoughts on this is that in a 170 degree
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"stopless" arc the rod will
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>straighten as theangle between the flyline and the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rod butt becomes acute.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The loop is still top pointed so I assume this to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>be true. The energy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stored in the bend rod has to go somewhere, either
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>through the tip
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>or through the butt. If you're rotating the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>through 170 while it's
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>unbending the energy is going to go through the tip
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>without the need
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for an abrupt stop. At least this is what I *think*
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is happening.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What we really need is a high speed camera. I hope
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to have access to one
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>before I leave NZ.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Incidentally I know of a Spanish distance caster
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>who uses the swoop to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cast into the mid 120s.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jeff....
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You bring up some interesting points.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I'll pass this on to the Group with the suggestion
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that it may help to print this out and study it at
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>leisure. There is a lot of thought going into
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this message.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Gordy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    > ;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jeff Wagner <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Gordon Hill <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: STOP?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:49:34 -0700
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordy,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This thread is very interesting. Hope you dont
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mind if I put in a word.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Paul on a a few issues and you on
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>others.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When casting, any speed that is directly applied
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to the rod is also applied to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fly line. In which case the line will
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>continue forward whether the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stops or slows or just gets out of the way. We
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can see this when we do a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thrust cast as paul notes. However is this the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>most efficient cast? I will
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest no, and state that it is possible to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>perform this cast with an
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unflexible lever by simply slinging the line.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any more distance is achieved by
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the energy imparted to the fly line by the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>flexing (unflexing) of a fly rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, energy from the cast by a fly rod is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>imparted at some point in the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cast. Where? It can only be during a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration after a maximum velocity is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achieved. In other words for the distance caster
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>after the loading move the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speed up and the wrist flip we achieve maximum
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>velocity. At this point we
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could maintain this velocity however we usually
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>run out of arm. In which case
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we decelerate and the rod unflexs and imparts
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy into the fly line. Again
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence for this can be seen in casting a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>unflexible lever versus casting a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fly rod. We cast farther with a fly rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rate of deceleration I think is the key. As
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can be seen in Bruce's fly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> casting analyzer. The faster the deceleration
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the more quickly the energy is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfered to the rod and the more efficient the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy transfer is as the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy is not wasted over a long period of time.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This quick deceleration is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the difference between great casters like Rajeff
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and a beginner cast.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you and Jeff noted it is possible to make to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>abrupt of a stop without taking
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proper measures and shock the rod. However if
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you watch Rajeff and others like
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him they do take measures after a VERY abrupt
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop often tilting the tip of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rod down and lifting the butt of the rod up
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(usually with very stiff rods that
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebound very quickly) to move the tip of the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>out of the way of the oncoming
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fly line. An action needed because of the abrupt
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stop teamed with a very narrow
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> casting arc.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have attemped to demonstrate this when
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>casting. I will first carry a good
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amount of line and on the final forward stroke
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>continue forward and lay the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down without really stopping the rod, simply
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>continuing the motion only changing
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> direction toward the ground with the rod while
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the fly line continues to unroll.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second, I cast normal and stop the rod abruptly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>causing counterflex in the rod.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The normal casts with a stop and subsuquently a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>counterflex always go farther. The cast which has
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>no defined stop as in a thrust cast still has a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deceleration
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and energy transfered to the fly line this is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>unavoidable as the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straightens. However, a very long deceleration
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>or lack of a stop as we are
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling it here would transfer less energy.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would also note that at the veolcity reached
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>by many great distance casters it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be very difficult to bring the rod to a full
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>instantaneous stop. Instead
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rod would continue forward and actually
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>soften the stop slightly.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still a defined quick deceleration of the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>after maximum velocity of the tip
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will offer the best transfer of energy, the best
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>case scenario for distance
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> casting.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeff Wagner
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master Certified Fly Casting Instructor,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Federation of Fly Fishers
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fly Fishing Buyer, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fly Fishing Guide, Jax Outdoor Gear
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Redington Pro Staff
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 970-481-5887
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.dhflyfishing.com
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Gordon Hill <hillshead@xxxxxxx>:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Paul... We are getting a little complicated
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for many in our
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Group, here. My brief comments in your text in
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>BOLD CAPS. > >Gordy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >-------------------------
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > From: /"Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Reply-To: /"Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >To: /"Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>/
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Subject: /Re: Actual demo of ESSENTIALS/
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Date: /Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:32:15 -0000/
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Hi Gordy,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >The reason I'd like to see casting arc included
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in (3) is because it >deals with progressive
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >rod bending and is quite specific. It's
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>possible to make a long cast >a short stroke
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>length,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >underhand casting styles for example. Bruce
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Richards reckons drag
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >[translational rod movement
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >pre-butt rotation] removes slack, Bill Gammel
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>thinks it removes sag, >I think it adds Kinetic
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Energy. It probably does all three. But I don't
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>think increasing
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >stroke length is an essential
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >whereas widening the casting arc most certainly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is. I AGREE THAT,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >\"STROKE LENGTH\" DOESN'T COVER IT ALL. AS I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LOOK AT IT , TIP
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TRAVEL IS >MOST IMPORTANT......A COMBINATION OF
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>STROKE LENGTH, ROD (CASTING) ARC, >AND ANY OTHER
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TRANSLATIONAL MOVEMENTS IN THE DIRECTION OF THE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CAST. (WE >MUST REMEMBER THAT BACK WHEN THESE WERE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WRITTEN, MANY WERE USING THE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >TERM, \"STROKE LENGTH\" TO MEAN WHAT
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WE >NOW CALL, \"TIP TRAVEL\".) PRE-BUTT ROTATION,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>\"PULL\", \"DRAG\" OR >ANY TRANSLATIONAL MOTION
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IN THE DIRECTION OF THE CAST PROBABLY
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >_DOES_ REMOVE SLACK AND SAG AND ADDS KINETIC
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ENERGY.......ALL
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>THREE (AS >I SEE IT.)
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >(6) is very interesting. Something I teach, is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to say "stop harder". >What is someone
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >doing when they think "stop harder"? Hopefully
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>they're squeezing the >hand, which
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >results in rotating the butt at the end of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stroke, which is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >"proper power application". I THINK YOU ARE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>RIGHT. FLOYD FRANKE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>PUTS IT >THIS WAY WHEN HE TEACHES THIS : \"SQUEEZE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TO A STOP\". HELPS A LOT WITH >ACCURACY CASTING,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TOO.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >I'd like to say I knew the answer here, but I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>don't. The argument
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >for an abrupt
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >stop is that it gives a more efficient transfer
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of energy from rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >to line, but on a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >170 casting arc I reckon that most of that
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy has already been >transferred
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >before the stop. Where's the stop on a swoop or
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a thrust, for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >example?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >If it's at the end of thrust the rod's hit RSP,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>energy's been
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >transferred and you may as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >well drop the rod. YES. THIS IS GROUND UPON
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WHICH FEW DARE TO TROD >!.......WE RISK BEING
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CALLED HERETICS. ON THE SO-CALLED, \"THRUST
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >CAST\" AS WELL AS THE, \"SWOOP\" IT DOES APPEAR
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>THAT YOU'VE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ALREADY >GONE PAST RSP. HERE, THE TRUE STOP IS
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WHEN, \"YOU RUN OUT OF ARM\". OF >COURSE THE ROD
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IS STRAIGHT AT THE END OF THE THRUST.....BUT THAT
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MAY >HAVE OCCURRED A SPLIT SECOND EARLIER. I'VE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SEEN LEFTY DEMO THIS AND >LITERALLY DROP THE ROD
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ON THE GROUND AFTER THE THRUST. THE LOOP SHOOTS
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >OUT WITH TREMENDOUS SPEED AND ITS DIRECTION IS
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>UNCHANGED. BEST NOT TO >TEACH THAT THRUST WIND
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CAST EXCEPT TO ADVANCED CASTERS WHO HAVE ENOUGH
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >CONTROL TO AVOID ELBOW INJURY.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Sorry I know this is not very good teaching for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a study group. Some >day we'll
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >know everything and then we'll try our best to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>forget it all.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Incidentally I find emphasising "power
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>application" as opposed to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >"stop" can have
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >a more positive effect. Just a different way of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>getting the same
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >stroke nailed. I HOPE WE NEVER DO KNOW
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EVERYTHING ! IT WOULD BE
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LIKE >FINDING THE, \"NEVER-FAIL\" FLY. I DO SO
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LOVE GETTING INTO SUPER >DETAIL....BUT I DON'T
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WANT OUR GROUP TO LOSE SIGHT OF THE FOREST FOR
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >SAKE OF TOO MANY TREES. > GORDY
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >PS I can't believe Tip Travel has already been
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>invented; we'll have >to come
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >up with something different.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >PPS I shouldn't have eaten beans last night.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:13 PM
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Subject: Re: Actual demo of ESSENTIALS
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Paul....
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Interesting points.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>On 3.)....."Short cast: short stroke, Long
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cast: long stroke" is,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>as we both know, a gross oversimplification.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>For the long >>cast,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>we >>need a long distance travel for the rod tip.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We don't need it for the >>short cast. Of course,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this is tip travel is produced by the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>combination of many things, including rod arc
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(casting arc),
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stroke >>length (as defined by the distance moved
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>by the hand) and, with >>very long casts, the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>caster's body motion. Even a step forward
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>during the delivery stroke adds to that tip
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>travel.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>(Incidentally, the first reference in the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>casting literature I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>could find was in J.C. Mottram's book, FLY
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CASTING,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>originally >>published in 1921. So the term is a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>resurrection not a new
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>coining.)
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>On 6.) One can have a whimpy stop (a mush) and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>still get the fly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>out there on target......but is that the most
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>efficient way to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>do it >>?......I think not.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I simply can't make anywhere near the distance
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>on my distance cast >>with a soft stop. Just
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can't do it !
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>You call attention to the concept of crisp
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>application of power.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Now if we have that anywhere in the stroke
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>except in
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>juxtaposition to >>the stop, we have a spike of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>power.......high liklihood of a tailing >>loop.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Having said that, I realize fully that there
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are many casts which
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>are done well with hardly a stop, or even no
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>real stop. These
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>include >>certain curve casts such as the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>corkscrew cast, the helicopter cast, >>and other
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>decelerating curve casts....in fact,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>any >>purposely decelerated cast. It certainly
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>includes the, "no stop" of >>the back cast during
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>what has been called the, "European continuous
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>tension cast" as well as other elliptical casts
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>including the >>so-called, "Belgian cast".
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>As I happen to look at it, a crisp stop is an
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>essential for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>so-labelled, "straight line overhead
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>casting"......NOT ALL
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CASTING, >>BY ANY MEANS. If we look at it that
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>way, you are absolutely >>CORRECT.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Gordy
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>From: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Reply-To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>To: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Subject: Re: Actual demo of ESSENTIALS
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:19:38 -0000
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Hi Gordy,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I've been thinking about the essentials listed
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>below and I don't
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>agree that [6] is an essential.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I think what's really happening when a caster
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is thinking about
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>making an abrupt stop
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>is that he's really making a crisp power
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>application [5]. There are >>quite a few
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"stopless" casting styles
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>including the TLT and Austrian style - which
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as you know is how
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>most Continental Europeans cast.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I know that runs contrary to much of what we
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>teach but many
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>distance casters don't use an
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>abrupt stop either but integrate drift/swoop
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>into their stroke. I >>just sort of flop the rod
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>over
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>and hope.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I used to think that the stop was the most
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>important thing in
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>flycasting, I now think it restricts
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>distance.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I think [3] should be or include proper
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>casting arc.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>I hope you're getting some good fishing.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Cheers,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Paul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Group...
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Following a suggestion by Molly Semenik, I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have one more >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >question on the 5 (or 6) ESSENTIALS.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > In your own words, describe what you would
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>do to demonstrate
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >clearly to a group of fly casting students,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>each essential.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You may >> >use a fly outfit or any other
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>teaching prop or tool.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 1.) Straight Line Path of Rod Tip - I have
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a short (one foot)
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >section of a rod tip complete with tip top
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>guide. It >> enables
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>me to >> >hold the short section up to eye level
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and while moving it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>back >>and >forth as per casting strokes, I can
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>use the other hand to >>clearly >demonstrate the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>straight line path by accompanying the rod >>tip
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with >the flat palm of my other hand.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 2.) Eliminate Slack - When teaching, I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>always stress this very
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >early in the lesson. I have always liked and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>used Lefty's >> way
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of >> >putting this. With the line laying out
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about 30' with a bit of >> >slack, he points to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the fly and leader and states: "Ain't nothing >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >gonna happen until that fly starts to move."
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>After stating that >> >fact, I demonstrate how
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>much of the back stroke is wasted pulling
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >out slack that was not removed. I also, to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>indicate the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>uselessness
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >of slack in casting and to interject a little
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>levity >>as a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bit of an >ice breaker, use the analogy of a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>drunk pulling a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>chain down the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >street, when asked by a very proper lady, why he
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is >>pulling
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a chain, >he replies, "Lady, did you ever try
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pushing one
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>of these things?"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 3.) Short Line - Short Stroke, Long Line -
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Long Stroke - I use
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >analogies here also. To indicate proper
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>stroke length, I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pantomine >> >throwing a line-drive baseball,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>which requires a short straight line >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >throw/stroke for a close throw and a longer
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>straight >>stroke for a >longer ball. I also have
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the student watch the rod as >>I make longer
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >strokes while adding line.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 4.) Pause - I like to use the term -Timely
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Pause - With >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >beginners I try to have them temporarily adapt
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to a 90% stance
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>and >watch their back cast straighten (almost
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>straighten). >>This
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>has >>a >dual-fold purpose, as it allows them to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>see the line trajectory >>and >often helps to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>keep their back casts up where they belong. If
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>the >individual has trouble watching their
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>back cast, I revert >>again to >one of Lefty's old
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>methods. I ask them where they are >>from, and I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >instruct them to make a back cast while pausing
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>long
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>enough to state
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >their name and where they are from. It works
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>like >>a charm
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>on a 30' >cast.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 5.) Proper Application of Power. - When
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>explaining power and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >how to apply it, I have started to use a term
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>believe >> >our
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>own >Gordy has coined, and that is "An
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>accelerated >>acceleration
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to a >> >stop", I have never heard it explained
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>better. For this all >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >important step I also use hands on guidance with
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>permission.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>There >are many analogies for this also, such
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as driving in >>low
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>gear >>then >shifting to second and finally high.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 6.) Abrupt Stop - When trying to explain
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the importance of the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >stop, I allude to the elite distance
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>caster's (Steve >> Rajeff)
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>words, >> >when he was asked: What do the best
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>casters do that
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>other's >>fail to >do? And he replied; "They stop
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the rod." As to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>demonstrating this, I >again like to, with
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>permission of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>course, use >>hands on. It is a >wonderful way to
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have the student actually feel >>the abruptness of
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >the required stop. Here again there are many
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>visual >>aids we can >apply, throwing water at a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wall off of a paint brush, >>slinging an
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >apple from a dowel rod and so on.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Since I have a plethora of beginners here
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in the Catskills, I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >have printed out little cards (laminated)
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>essentials >> listed >and hand them out at the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>end of a one day lesson. I
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tell >> them to put >them in their wallet or
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>purse and refer to them if >> necessary when >they
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are practicing, and then I always add; "You
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>do >>plan to >practice, don't you?"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>> >
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >