[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Effective Rod Length (ERL)
- Subject: Effective Rod Length (ERL)
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 09:26:16 -0400
Walter &
Group.....
From Walter Simberski :
Hi Gordy,
I interpret Marinaro's definition of effective
length a little bit differently. I agree that he says the effective
length
is at the point of maximum bend in the cast, i.e.
there is an effective length for a given cast that does not change
during the specific cast, but different casts with
the same rod could have a different effective length. The effective
length for a cast will depend on load and
resistance which would vary with the amount of line outside the rod
tip,
the use of a haul, and the magnitude of
acceleration.
I've been using effective rod length as something
that can vary throughout the cast.
Walter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Walter...
Until now, I've looked at
EFFECTIVE ROD LENGTH (ERL) as a static thing. A way of comparing fly rods
of different actual measured length and different
flexibilities.
Aitor Coteron has already
convinced me that we can see this as a dynamic entity. You join him in
doing so.
I'm still not certain as to
whether or not Vincent Marinaro and Don Phillips saw it in a dynamic way .....
but that is less important, I suppose, than the way in which we now choose to
use the term.
I do think that the same cast
(theoretically) with rods of differing flexibilities would demonstrate different
ERL's. Would the same rod with different casts demonstrate different ERL's
??? I guess so, if we look at it from a dynamic
standpoint.
Check out the detailed
message from Aitor with comments by me in the attachment.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message from Walter
Simberski on our comments to the Grunde Lovoll video casting clip
:
Hi Gordy and Aitor -
Sorry, but when I look at the video here is what I
see:
The rod is straight at the beginning of each
stroke, monotonically decreases in effective length and then
monotonically increases in effective length until it is straight again. My perception is that
during the time when the effective rod
length is decreasing that the rod butt is also
being accelerated and during the time when the effective rod length is
increasing
the rod butt is decelerating.
I don't see any point in the cast where the
effective rod length appears to increase in length as
the rod butt is accelerating.
Walter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Walter....
I went back and studied this
again. I think you are correct. Seeing those lines without graphic
superimposition for me is sometimes not easy. The only way I can judge
acceleration of the rod butt is by the apparent angular change at the handle and
rod bend. Not sure how accurate that really is.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachment:
For Gordy.doc
Description: Binary data