[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • Mono strength



    Walter & Group....

    For those of you who couldn't open the attachments to Server's message,  yesterday,  I'll re-send in a different format.

    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

    Gordy,

    John’s suggestion is excellent; target shooters practice shooting at moving targets! His suggestion now provides one such opportunity…a remote controlled fish!! This idea could be incorporated into part of your training or included as part of a casting competition.

                                                                          

    Regards,

    Lou

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    From Mac Brown:

    Hi Gordy,
    Thought this photo may be of interest to the group with regards to the mono. These were taken back in the mid 90's when we performed several tests on various leader materials. I knew from guiding that the one with pits in it was junk long before the test took place. I tried to be non biased as thinking that it must have been a bad batch-wrong it stayed that way for a decade. You could tie a fly on, moisten the knot, draw it down, and the material would always break far away from the knot. The pics illustrate what the strain gauge proved as well. The clear one (looks like a reflection in a mirror surface) had the best overall results for breaking strength. The test results used to be on a web page called Casting Angles. I maintained the site at WCU regarding the testing of fly lines, leaders, and rods for about a decade. Bruce can perhaps comment on their superb results of the 3m material. The one with lacerations failed quickly when dry tested (we can call this "junk brand" to protect the guilty). The interesting thing from those tests is if a material already has lacerations, then it fails much quicker when it becomes wet. As well as making it next to impossible to test knot strengths since it breaks far from the knots to begin with.  An interesting side tidbit was that the material with lacerations also had an actual breaking strength 52% weaker than advertised. Buyer beware is right.
     
    It was a bear to find this old pic, but as the adage goes-a picture is worth a thousand words. The photos were taken for me at Mississippi State Materials Lab by Ramsey Green in about 1995. This may help Tony as well in regards to the comment on the hearsays. Lesson to be gained from all of this is that mono quality varies dramatically from manufacturers.
    Cheers, Mac

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
    COMMENT:
     
    This is one reason not to use old abraided or cheap mono.  It is one of our biggest problems when fishing for tarpon, because the tarpon's mouth, while having no teeth, has an abrasive lining which will abraid any nylon mono or fluorocarbon quickly.... even to the point that we occasionally lose a fish despite the use of very heavy bite tippet of 60# or even 80# material !  Because of this, I'll change bite tippets even after a tarpon strike with no hookup if I retrieve the fly and feel the roughness of the tippet surface.
     
    I included Mac's attachments.    Gordy
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Attachment: 40Bnew-format.xls
    Description: Binary data

    Attachment: 60ftBH.xls
    Description: Binary data

    Attachment: junk brand.jpg
    Description: JPEG image

    Attachment: 3M.JPG
    Description: JPEG image