[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • Quiz answers (Overhang)



    Walter & Group....

    I'm back (and have over 400 messages to read and answer !)

    Here are answers to our quiz on OVERHANG by Michael Jones.  His answeres are in red.  My comments to his answers follow in bold blue italics.    G.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Gordy:


    1.)  How do you define overhang ?

    Overhang is the amount of running line behind the rear taper of the head of the fly line.

    Yes.  The length of running line between the rear taper and the rod tip.   G.

    2.)  It has been taught that overhand can very much affect your student's roll cast. 

                    a. Do you agree ?  I think you mean 'overhang, not overhand', and the answer is "Yes, too much overhang can adversely affect a student's success in performing an efficient roll cast".

                    b. If you do, tell us how ?  Too much overhang causes too much work on the end of the student to supply rod load vs. efficiency.  With too much thin running line (overhang), the caster must be ultimately efficient in the roll cast to achieve an efficient presentation of the leader.  A long rear taper (absence of overhang) allows the rod's loaded energy to transfer to a greater degree (greater efficiency) in presenting the leader, by virtue of a greater mass of line over a shorter distance.

    I did mean overhang.   Thanks !

    Tom White used to put it like this:  When roll casting you need "fat line" at or near the rod tip to turn over the thin line of the taper in front of it.  If you have "skinny line" beyond the rod tip as you start to roll cast,  that "skinny line" cannot turn over the "fat line" in front of it. 

    That "skinny line" between the rod tip and the back of the fly line head is OVERHANG.      G.

    3.)  One author quotes Steve Rajeff on the use of overhang when distance casting.  Who is that ?  Jim C. Chapralis

    I have not run across a quote by Jim Chapralis, though it may exist.  I was thinking of the one by Jason Borger in his, NATURE OF FLY CASTING, p. 240

    4.)  The quote in 3.) states that, "overhang is the barometer for the rate of turnover of the head."  Is this a question?

    Not a question..... leads to # 5.)

    5.)  BRIEFLY explain how that can affect distance casting with a shooting head.  (Assuming roll castingWith too much overhang, a long casting stroke is exhausted in attempting to move a long length of line with very little mass (shooting head + overhang), where keeping the shooting head closer to the rod tip increases the efficiency of the cast, resulting in a better executed shoot of the head, followed by the running line (shooting)!  This can be simply stated as:  "It is more efficient to shoot (overhanging) running line than it is to cast it, in a traditional roll cast."

    Well..... I meant distance straight line casting, not roll casting.    Casting is easier when you don't have to contend with much overhang.  However, much greater distance can be achieved when expert casters handle lots of overhang well.  Read the description in Jason's book.  Simply put:

    For practical purposes, the loop is only traveling forward as long as it is unrolling.  The longer it takes to unroll, then, the farther it goes (provided it doesn't drop to the surface due to gravity.)  When you cast with a shooting head and carry lots of overhang (the running line behind the head) it takes longer for the loop to unroll, hence greater distance.    G.

    6.)  Do you encourage your "intermediate" casting student to cast with maximum overhang ?  NO

    Agree.     G.

    7.)  Why ?  Maximum overhang casting is better suited for elite (not intermediate) casters.  If an intermediate caster could consistently manage and effectively present maximum overhang while roll casting, I would consider them "elite" casters.

    Not even elite casters can cast easily or get great distance whcn roll casting with lots of overhang.  These expert casters use it to advantage for straight line distance casting for the reasons I cited, above.     G.

    8.)  How do you measure overhang when casting with a CRT (continuous rear taper) fly line ?  By definition, overhang is considered the line behind the rear taper, so overhang would only be considered after the entire rear taper was out of the rod tip, independent of line designation.

    This is a trick question !  With the CRT line there is no true running line.  This is because the rear taper is a long continuous taper all the way to the back end of the line.  Having noted that, for practical purposes when lots of the thin part of this back taper lies between the rod tip and the head of the line, one could consider that as functionally a "shooting line".  Problem with measuring it is that there is no defined forward end point.    G.

    9.)  How do you measure it when fishing for pan fish or bass with a level fly line ?  By definition, there is no overhang with this set-up.

    Yes.  (Now you get the picture.)

    10.)  What happens when you cast with more overhang than you can handle ?  The resulting cast lacks efficiency in turning over the leader and possibly the body and front taper of the fly line.

    Yes.  Putting it differently, you may well lose control.  THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST COMMON PROBLEMS I SEE AS I MENTOR AND COACH MCCI CANDIDATES WHO HAVE TROUBLE MAKING WELL CONTROLLED 85' DISTANCE CASTS.

    THEY FALSE CAST UNTIL THEY HAVE MORE LINE AND OVERHANG OUT OF THE ROD TIP THAN THEY CAN HANDLE AND STILL HAVE TIGHT LOOPS WITH HIGH LOOP SPEED.  THEN THEY MAKE AN INEFFICIENT DELIVERY CAST.  EVEN IF THEY MAKE THE REQUIRED DISTANCE, THE LAYOUT IS SLOPPY AND THEY GIVE THE APPEARANCE OF WORKING MUCH TOO HARD TO MAKE THE CAST.   NOT A GOOD CAST TO SERVE TO TEACH THEIR STUDENTS !

    Bruce Richards and I discussed that at length and agreed that the principal reason elite casters such as Steve Rajeff can handle so much overhang to their advantage is their ability to have an almost straight line path of the rod tip in all planes coupled with really smooth continuous acceleration ending with rapid deceleration of the rod (what we teach as the STOP).   G.

    11.)  COUNTERFLEX is discussed in the messages, above.  What is it.  Counterflex is the directional progress of the rod past RSP after the 'stop' that results by virtue of the rods flexibility while carrying it's own mass forward. 

    Yes.       G.

    12.)  How does it differ from REBOUND ?  Counterflex is the absorption of the rods momentum when stopped in a forward direction.  Rebound is the reverse & diminished 'bounce' of counterflex, in the absolute opposite direction.

    Yes.    G.


    Michael Jones

    Maine

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Question from Mark Huber:

    HI Gordy,

    This is a portion of the discussion on overhang and counterflex from Capt. Kirk’s spey group.  My comments are in blue below.  This is something that I have never really fully understood.  Feel free to shoot it out to the group for comments.  I would like to get a better understanding of overhang and it impacts in the proper amount.

    a.      How does overhang reduce weight of line at rod tip at any time [not only at counterflex?] Let's say we are casting a 55 foot, short head spey line. Using a short amount of overhang, (running line in the top ring), there is less potential for counterflex that could open the loop. With a thicker length of fly line in the rings and tip guide, there is more potential for counterflex. Loop shape is largely determined by the path of the rod tip prior to RSP. Having the thin running line in the tip guides may facilitate a straighter path of the rod tip. Just guessing. That's the way I look at it. Comments from the group?

    As I understand overhang, is purpose to delay turnover of the loops and tighten the loop shape.  Tightening of the loop shape occurs due to less counterflex of the rod following loop formation.  Counterflex can be caused by several factors including 1) load of the rod (increased load increases counterflex), 2) a hard stop without dampening the rod (no dampening increases couterflex).  Counterflex is Newton 3rd law of motion at work “for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”.

    I don’t see how the mass/weight of line at the rod tip just prior to RSP would impact counterflex.  It seems that line weight/mass carried comes down to bend in the rod.  I understand this as increased mass/weight of the line carried can result in more bend/load in the rod resulting in increased counterflex.

    Assuming an otherwise SLP of the rod tip and other factors being equal, I have understood that the loops can be narrower with overhang due to the mass profile of the running line being less than the mass profile of the shooting head at loop formation.  Due to the increased mass of the shooting head, the shooting head over takes the running line at loop formation from momentum of the casting stroke absent being pulled over from the lower leg and thus a narrower loop.  That is the balance of overhang, the right amount of running line overhang and the shooting head maintains both direction and momentum at loop formation; provide too much overhang and there is less control of direction and reduced momentum at loop formation. 

    I have yet to get this concept nailed down in my mind.  Maybe someone with considerable experience casting shooting heads could chime in.

    Mark

     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Steve Rajeff's answer:

    Hi Gordy,

    I hope all is well for you and Priscilla.

     

    I do not think modest changes in overhang affects the load in the middle/butt area of the rod, only the immediate tip area,(top 10 – 20 % of rod length), depending on rod taper and stiffness.

    If there was a machine capable of making identical strokes/power/path of rod tip, and we could change lengths of overhang, I believe we would see the rod tip counter flex more at the moment of stop with no overhang, than with a long overhang. If someone were to put a pinch of putty, (maybe 1/4 oz), next to the tip top, it would increase the counter flex. By keeping the belly of the line close to the tip, I believe it creates more swing weight right at the rod tip causing the counter flex similar to the putty example. By lengthening the overhang, the rod tip does not support the weight of the belly (putty) through the moment of stopping, thereby creating less counter flex. Lengthening the overhang “disconnects” the weight of the belly to the rod tip. Changing the overhang within controllable limits, does not affect the major (middle/butt)  loading of the rod. Increases in overhang to the point of induced slack, waves, wrinkles into the line, (and whereby the caster cannot compensate by increasing stroke), detrimentally affects the cast. The goal of changing overhang, is to tighten the loop, maintain full control of the line during false casting (no slack, waves or wrinkles), and to reduce air resistance on the leading edge of the loop and to pierce the air viscosity.

     

    Steve

     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~